no notes returned

Published renter feedback repeatedly describes the team as “friendly,” “professional,” and “extremely responsive,” with amenities reported as “well maintained and easy to enjoy.” The main negative is location-related: one prospective renter said they passed because of the nearby train tracks, although a resident wrote that after two months they “never hear a peep from the train.”

Resident feedback is strongly positive on physical quality: one review says the “quality of the fixtures and finishes is truly top notch” and describes everything as “built to last.” Another reports that “repairs are promptly taken care of” and that upkeep is constant. No reviewed source reported leaks, flooding, HVAC, plumbing, electrical or elevator failures; that absence is not treated as evidence of condition.

Resident reviews describe staff as “incredibly kind, attentive” and say the team “go[es] above and beyond”; another says packages are received safely and recorded swiftly. The main operational criticism found was the pool schedule, with one resident disappointed that it closed by 7 p.m.; this is a single minor complaint rather than a recurring management failure.

Resident reviews describe the finishes and amenities as “top notch,” and one calls the building’s maintenance “impeccable.” Another resident says maintenance requests are “immediately addressed and resolved”; no review read reported structural, plumbing, HVAC, electrical, leak or waterproofing failures.

The published resident feedback is strongly positive: reviewers call the staff “awesome and super attentive,” say common areas are “always well kept,” and report that problems are resolved “extremely quick[ly].” The main negative reported was affordability—“The rents reflect the quality/luxury of the building... which means high rents”—rather than an operational failure.

no notes returned

Published reviews describe the staff and leasing process positively: one reviewer called the staff “very friendly and helpful,” while another said the team was “extremely responsive and helpful.” The main negative report alleged that the team failed to disclose “the air quality (cancer)” and a “huge mice problem”; this is a single reviewer’s allegation, not a corroborated recurring theme.

Structural feedback is sharply mixed. ApartmentRatings includes the report “New building, built poorly and constantly breaking,” with elevators regularly down, constant fire-alarm issues and faulty appliances; Brightplace’s review synthesis likewise reports elevator outages, leaks, warped walls, plumbing problems and some mold concerns. Against that, other residents say the property is “well-maintained” and that routine maintenance requests were handled quickly.

Residents frequently praise the staff: one says they are “always professional and responsive,” while another describes a smooth move-in and “great communication from property management.” The lived experience is not uniformly positive: reviewers also report limited guest parking, a pool closed with no reopening date, hallway trash smells, road noise, and residential hall doors that “don't lock fully (safety hazard).”

The published building-record sources report two whole-building heat/hot-water emergency requests on December 20, 2018, both closed by December 23, while no heat or hot-water complaints were reported in the latest three-year period covered by the current record. The same record reports no recent bedbug-infested units and no current open HPD flags; a separate building profile says the latest available façade filing classified the façade as “Safe,” but future inspections and repairs remain building-specific.

The visible Google-linked feedback includes “Muy limpio y buena atención” and “Beautiful building,” while another reviewer explicitly noted they had visited rather than lived there. Published building profiles describe an attended lobby or doorman and amenities including a roof deck, residents’ lounge, fitness center and children’s playroom; these are amenity descriptions, not current resident satisfaction scores.

no notes returned

A March 2024 resident forum discussion described the building as “gorgeous, very quiet, and tranquil,” with “well-furnished” lounges and a rooftop with BBQ grills; another local resident said it was quieter than the surrounding block. The same discussion noted that the only recurring nearby disturbance reported by that participant was that things could become “a lil crazy” during school bus drop-offs and pickups, while a touring applicant described the apartments as nice but small.