Artificial Intelligence
Builders Company
Developers/Caliber
C
CaliberScottsdale, United States · founded 2009 · 1 active markets
PUBLIC LISTED

Caliber builds, acquires, renovates, develops, and operates commercial real estate, including hospitality, multifamily, industrial, office, retail, and specialty assets, primarily in Arizona, Colorado, and Texas. It serves accredited investors, financial professionals, institutions, and communities through vertically integrated investment and development.

Years in business
17
founded 2009
LinkedIn headcount
141 people; a separate LinkedIn profile description states 50-60
employees, as shown on LinkedIn · size band 51–200
Portfolio value
USD 2.6 BILLION
December 31, 2025
Assets under management
USD 0.8 BILLION
December 31, 2025
Projects last researched October 11, 2026
Every figure on this card was read out of a document.

Overview

Investor tear sheet

a summary of the tabs that follow · no rating of our own

Company dossier

Legal name
CaliberCos Inc.1
Headquarters
8901 E Mountain View Rd, Scottsdale, United States
Founded
2009
Entity type
PUBLIC LISTED1
Business model
commercial1
Markets
1 market listed
What they build
Residential, for rent (4 of 6) · Retail (1 of 6) · Mixed use (1 of 6)
Full dossier in About →

Delivery record

3 date-assessed of 6 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 2 undated and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
6
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
+6.5 mo
the middle of 3 scored projects
Average delay
+6.2 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
2.1 yrs
start to completion, over 3 delivered projects
Worst slip
+6.5 mo
Eclipse Townhomes · +1.0 to +12.0
1
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
2
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
0
red rows below

Against other developers

3 date-assessed here · 245 developers, 919 date-assessed projects in United States
Median delay
Caliber·245 developers in United States
+6.5 mo vs +4.5 mo
this developer 2.0 mo worse
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
Caliber·245 developers in United States
+6.2 mo vs +7.5 mo
this developer 1.3 mo better
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
Caliber·245 developers in United States
33% vs 55%
this developer 22 pts worse
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
Caliber·245 developers in United States
2.1 yrs vs 2.9 yrs
this developer 0.8 yrs faster
Start to completion, over 3 delivered here and 758 in the market.
Projects and timelines in Track Record →

Resident experience

5 of 6 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
6.3/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 5 of 5 rated buildings
Structure & systems
5.5/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 4 of 5 rated buildings
Management & living
5.6/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 5 of 5 rated buildings

Against other developers

5 rated here · 265 developers, 1365 rated buildings in United States
Overall rating
Caliber · 265 other developers in United States
6.3 vs 7.8
this developer 1.5 worse
The weighted verdict on each side. From 5 of 5 rated buildings here and 1365 in the market.
Structure & systems
Caliber · 265 other developers in United States
5.5 vs 7.0
this developer 1.5 worse
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 4 of 5 rated buildings here and 574 in the market.
Management & living
Caliber · 265 other developers in United States
5.6 vs 7.4
this developer 1.8 worse
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 5 of 5 rated buildings here and 1312 in the market.
The market here is United States: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.
Ratings by building →

Awards & recognition

All awards →

Risks & source coverage

Record status
active
Company sources
52 source entries across 52 fields
Projects tracked
8 · 6 completed in assessment
All flags and sources →

Track Record

Delivery record

3 date-assessed of 6 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 2 undated and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
6
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
+6.5 mo
the middle of 3 scored projects
Average delay
+6.2 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
2.1 yrs
start to completion, over 3 delivered projects
Worst slip
+6.5 mo
Eclipse Townhomes · +1.0 to +12.0
1
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
2
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
0
red rows below

Against other developers

3 date-assessed here · 245 developers, 919 date-assessed projects in United States
Median delay
Caliber·245 developers in United States
+6.5 mo vs +4.5 mo
this developer 2.0 mo worse
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
Caliber·245 developers in United States
+6.2 mo vs +7.5 mo
this developer 1.3 mo better
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
Caliber·245 developers in United States
33% vs 55%
this developer 22 pts worse
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
Caliber·245 developers in United States
2.1 yrs vs 2.9 yrs
this developer 0.8 yrs faster
Start to completion, over 3 delivered here and 758 in the market.
The market here is United States: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because planning regimes and reporting norms move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a size band. Read the two delay figures together. A median close to the market with a much better average means no single disaster; the reverse means one project is carrying the record. Time to deliver runs from the earliest start we hold to the completion itself — a construction start where a source gave one, otherwise a sales launch, otherwise the launch year read as its January. A handover the sources place only inside a year is read as that December, so a duration is the widest the record allows rather than the flattering end of it. Only delivered projects dated at both ends count, so it is taken over fewer projects than the delay figures, and a long build is not a fault: a tower is not a villa run. Sourced figures only, both sides, and values taken from documents held on file are excluded here — a developer who shares their records should not score better than one who does not.

Construction start to handover

6 of 6 projects dated · 6 places
Based on covered projects with documented construction or launch dates and available handover dates. Timelines vary by project and may not represent the developer’s full portfolio.
Construction start, or the launchTarget completion (window)Completion or handover, as reportedCurrently statedLaunch year only, no date publishedEarly or ≤6 mo lateOver 6–12 mo lateOver 12 mo lateStalled
Bryan, United States
Mesa, United States
Tempe, United States
Phoenix, United States
Scottsdale, United States
Tucson, United States
20172018201920202021202220232024202520262027todayBRYAN, UNITED STATEScompleted, no target publishedMESA, UNITED STATES+5.5 moverifiedTEMPE, UNITED STATES+20 moestimatedPHOENIX, UNITED STATEScompleted, no target publishedSCOTTSDALE, UNITED STATES+6.5 moverifiedTUCSON, UNITED STATES+6.5 moverified
Click a row in the chart to open a project, or a table row below to see its sources. The chart runs wider than the page where the record spans many years — scroll it sideways to follow a project to its handover. Every date we have is drawn. A hollow marker is only a launch year, not a date anyone published. No dates published means we looked and found none; dates not yet checked means we have not looked yet. Handing over is not finished — rows say which. A delay is shown when one source gives the promised date and another gives the real one, however rough: "2019" still counts, and the row shows how wide that is. Projects missing one of the two dates, or with sources that disagree, are left out of the figures. 6 turned out to be about something else — a phase, a neighbour, the wider masterplan — and are marked off-subject.

Building & Livability Ratings

Resident experience

5 of 6 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
6.3/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 5 of 5 rated buildings
Structure & systems
5.5/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 4 of 5 rated buildings
Management & living
5.6/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 5 of 5 rated buildings

Against other developers

5 rated here · 265 developers, 1365 rated buildings in United States
Overall rating
Caliber · 265 other developers in United States
6.3 vs 7.8
this developer 1.5 worse
The weighted verdict on each side. From 5 of 5 rated buildings here and 1365 in the market.
Structure & systems
Caliber · 265 other developers in United States
5.5 vs 7.0
this developer 1.5 worse
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 4 of 5 rated buildings here and 574 in the market.
Management & living
Caliber · 265 other developers in United States
5.6 vs 7.4
this developer 1.8 worse
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 5 of 5 rated buildings here and 1312 in the market.
The market here is United States: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.

By building

5 rated · 1 not rated · scale 1–10
ProjectOverallStructure & systemsManagement & living
Hilton Tucson EastEast Tucson, Tucson232 units
7.3/ 10
6.9/ 10
6.6/ 10
Tripadvisor 4.2/5, 4.1/5, 4.2/5 · 1,684 reviews · tripadvisor.com
Combined from 3 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.6.

Tripadvisor’s 4/5 building-level guest rating, based on 1,684 reviews, sets the level and converts to 7.0 under the specified curve. Repeated praise for staff, cleanliness, comfort and amenities supports a modest upward adjustment, while the limited maintenance and service concerns keep the result below a higher score; structure is lower-confidence because the published evidence is sparse and guest-based.

− Minor maintenance issues
+ Friendly staff+ Attentive service+ Clean rooms+ Comfortable rooms+ Pool and fitness amenities
− Occasional service lapses− Parking and breakfast fees affect value− Minor maintenance complaints

Published material contains only limited physical-condition evidence. One reviewer reported “very, very minor maintenance things,” while Tripadvisor’s review summary says some guests mention maintenance issues; there is no published evidence here of flooding, major structural failure, or prolonged lift outages.

The day-to-day guest experience is generally favorable: Tripadvisor reports that guests commend cleanliness, an inviting atmosphere and friendly staff, and individual reviews call the staff “courteous, professional and pleasant” and the rooms clean. The same material says service can occasionally falter and that parking and breakfast fees affect perceived value; the review set also includes “very, very minor maintenance things.”

Second Avenue CommonsDowntown Mesa, Mesa144 units
7.2/ 10
7.9/ 10
RentCafe 5/5 · 3 reviews · rentcafe.com
RentCafe publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9.
7.4/ 10
RentCafe 4.5/5, 4.5/5, 5/5, 4.5/5, 4.5/5, 4.5/5 · 3 reviews · rentcafe.com
Combined from 6 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.4.

Google’s building-level 4.0/5 rating from 26 reviews is the largest qualifying review base, converting to 7.0 under the specified curve. Repeated complaints about parking, night safety and noise justify a modest downward commentary adjustment, while the strong staff, cleanliness and amenities praise prevents a larger reduction; the structure figure is based only on RentCafe’s published 5.0/5 maintenance sub-score from 3 reviews.

+ New construction+ Quick maintenance response+ Well-maintained amenities+ Modern appliances and finishes
− Pest/bug report from drains and sinks
+ Friendly office staff+ Responsive management+ Quiet atmosphere+ Clean common areas+ Pool and fitness amenities
− Parking shortage− Night-time neighbourhood safety concerns− Mandatory trash-valet and internet fees− Package-delivery inconvenience− Neighbour noise complaint

The available infrastructure-related feedback is broadly positive: RentCafe published a 5.0/5 maintenance sub-score from 3 reviews, and residents described the property as new with maintenance “always on top of things.” Countering that, one Google review reported bugs repeatedly emerging from shower drains and sinks and spreading through the unit; this is a serious individual report, not a demonstrated recurring building-wide pattern.

Day-to-day reviews are generally favourable: residents call the staff “fantastic,” say managers solve problems “very quickly,” and describe the apartments as “super clean and spacious,” with a nice gym and pool. The main repeated operational weakness is parking—one reviewer said residents must arrive by 7 p.m. to find a space—and another reported night-time safety concerns; RentCafe also records complaints about mandatory trash valet/internet charges and package access.

GC Square ApartmentsGrand Canyon University, Phoenix165 units
7.0/ 10
5.6/ 10
Zumper Expert Rating 6/10 · no review count · zumper.com
Zumper Expert Rating publishes 6/10 with no review count. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 5.6.
7.3/ 10
Zumper Expert Rating 8.8/10, 10/10, 10/10, 9/10, 8/10 · no review count · zumper.com
Combined from 5 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.3.

The current property at 3535 W Camelback Road is presented under the successor name Rise Canyon West, while Caliber's material identifies the same address and records that GC Square was sold in 2022; this makes current reviews relevant to the physical asset but leaves some name-continuity uncertainty. Google’s 4.1/5 from 111 reviews sets a 7.0 converted anchor, and the reported security, mold and pest complaints pull the resident-experience score down to 6.5 despite substantial positive staff and upkeep commentary.

+ Full-unit renovation down to the studs+ New roofs+ Individual HVAC units+ New kitchens and bathrooms+ Upgraded pool, spa and common areas
− Mold complaint− Roach infestation complaint
+ Helpful leasing staff+ Fast maintenance response+ Clean and quiet grounds+ Gated community+ Pool and pet-wash amenities
− Traffic and siren noise− Driveway gate failures− One complaint about rude management− High rent complaint

Caliber reported a full renovation completed in April 2018, including units renovated down to the studs, new kitchens and bathrooms, individual HVAC units and new roofs. Later review material is less uniformly positive: one resident said maintenance sprayed and painted over recurring suspected mold, while another wrote that the property was “ROACH infested”; these are individual reports rather than an established repeated pattern.

Published reviews commonly praise staff as “professional, kind, and quick to respond,” and describe the complex as “very clean, quiet and well maintained”; another resident said minor move-in issues were handled “in a very quick timely manner.” Countervailing reviews report that the driveway gate failed repeatedly, traffic and sirens were noisy, and one resident called a manager “the most rude disgusting person to deal with.”

Eclipse TownhomesSouth Scottsdale, Scottsdale20 units
5.7/ 10
—/ 10
5.6/ 10

ApartmentRatings is the only published building-specific aggregate located and reports 3.7/5 from 7 resident reviews, which converts to approximately 6.1/10 before commentary. The final 5.6 reflects the single serious safety report, repeated maintenance/management complaints and limited repeated praise for unit quality; no structure score is assigned because the reviews do not provide enough building-fabric evidence.

− Washer leak reported− Dryer remained unrepaired
+ Units described as nice+ Management described as very nice
− Slow maintenance response− Poor customer service− Safety concern− Noise concern− Neglected landscaping

The reviews read do not publish a structural or building-systems score. One resident reported that a washer was leaking onto the floor and that, 15 days after reporting a broken dryer, it still was not fixed; another said the units themselves were nice, but these comments do not establish overall structural condition.

Day-to-day feedback is mixed but leans negative: one resident called property management “very nice,” while another said customer service and maintenance were “absolutely terrible,” citing a 10-day wait to begin repairs and a dryer still unrepaired 15 days later. Reviews also mention a drive-by shooting, domestic-abuse-related police calls, noise, dirty move-in conditions and landscaping that had been allowed to deteriorate.

The Roosevelt – Phase IDowntown Tempe, Tempe15 units
4.4/ 10
1.5/ 10
1.0/ 10

Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest published review base found for the building: 2.1/5 from 20 reviews, which converts to 1.3/10 under the specified curve. The written evidence reinforces a very poor resident experience through repeated communication, maintenance and construction complaints, although a small number of residents report helpful maintenance and a clean, quiet community. The 2020 completion and amenity descriptions are historical developer material, not current proof of condition; no current independent engineering inspection was found.

+ Modern design and layout+ High-SEER heating and cooling advertised+ Hybrid water heaters advertised+ PEX plumbing advertised+ Energy-efficient construction features advertised
− Fragile finishes− Flooring waves reported− Heating outage reported− Exterior hose faucet failure reported− Stair damage left unresolved
+ Helpful maintenance reported+ Quiet community+ Clean property+ Friendly residents+ Convenient downtown location
− Unresponsive management− Missed or delayed tours− Maintenance delays− Package theft reports− No on-site clubhouse

The published property description advertises high-SEER heating and cooling, hybrid water heaters, PEX plumbing and energy-efficient construction. Resident reviews nevertheless report that the units are “very poor quality,” with “waves” in a family-room floor, blinds falling, an outdoor hose faucet spraying water for a day, and heat unavailable for multiple days; these are resident observations rather than an engineering inspection.

Daily-life feedback is sharply mixed but the aggregate is poor: the Google-linked review set is 2.1/5 from 20 reviews, with residents repeatedly describing unanswered emails and calls, while one resident said Andrea was “very helpful” and maintenance was “promptly and efficiently” handled. Other praise mentions a quiet, clean community and convenient location, but complaints include missed tours, package theft and the absence of an on-site clubhouse for management access.

Only buildings that have reached handover are rated. 1 of 6 projects carries no rating: a building still under construction is never asked about, one that has just been handed over may not have been reached yet, and the rest were asked about and no published resident commentary was found. Structure is fixed at handover and stays the developer's; management and living belongs to whoever runs the building now. The overall verdict weights both rather than averaging them. None of this is checked: a rating is what people published about a building, aggregated — it is not evidence, it cannot move a delay figure, and it is not part of the delivery record above.

About

Company dossier

Legal name
CaliberCos Inc.
Headquarters
8901 E Mountain View Rd, Scottsdale, United States
85258
Founded
2009
Entity type
PUBLIC LISTED
Revenue
USD 20.1 MILLION
year ended December 31, 2025
Business model
commercial

Offices

head office and 1 other
Bryan

Sources: office cities

FILING2026-03-25

CaliberCos Inc. Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2025

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
We also lease office space in Bryan, Texas.
value seen: Bryan
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728226000015/cwd-20251231.htm

Partners

4 partners
Hyatt
partner

Caliber has a Master Development Agreement with Hyatt to build up to 15 Hyatt Studios locations.

PURE Pickleball & Padel
joint venture

PURE partnered with Caliber to build a large indoor pickleball and padel facility and pro arena in Scottsdale.

GIA Hospitality, LLC
joint venture

Caliber Hospitality Development is a joint venture between Caliber and GIA Hospitality.

Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
government partner

The Community Planning Department approved design review for the joint-venture PURE project.

Sources: partners

COMPANY2024-10-01

Private Equity Real Estate Investment Firm | Caliber

Caliber
Master Development Agreement with Hyatt to build up to 15 Hyatt Studios locations
value seen: Master Development Agreement with Hyatt
https://www.caliberco.com/

Sources: partners

PRESS2025-05-08

Caliber Receives Design Review Approval for PURE Pickleball & Padel Project

Caliber
PURE Pickleball & Padel has partnered with Caliber to build ... facility and pro arena
value seen: partnered with Caliber
https://www.caliberco.com/caliber-receives-design-review-approval-for-pure-pickleball-padel-project/

Sources: partners

PRESS2025-05-13

Release Details

CaliberCos Inc. · carried by ir.caliberco.com
a joint venture between Caliber and GIA Hospitality, LLC
value seen: joint venture between Caliber and GIA Hospitality, LLC
https://ir.caliberco.com/news-releases/news-release-details/caliber-hospitality-development-launches-pursue-opportunistic

Registrations & licences

TAX ID47-2426901
U.S. Internal Revenue Service · US · Delaware corporation
Jurisdiction-agnostic: a DLD number, a Companies House number and a state RERA registration all land in the same table.

Contact

Markets

1 countries
United Statesactive 6 projects tracked

What they build

5 types
Residential, for rent4 of 6
Retail1 of 6
Mixed use1 of 6
Residential, for sale1 of 6
Hotel1 of 6
A project counts once under each type it carries, so the shares add to more than the project count.

Management

Principals & executives

6 names found
JC
John C. “Chris” Loeffler, II
Chris Loeffler is Caliber’s co-founder, CEO and board chair. He directs global strategy, investments and fund management, and contributes to private and public capital formation; before Caliber he worked in PwC’s audit and assurance practice.
Current title
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
PwC
Education
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoBachelor of Science in Business Administration (Accounting)
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
Co-founderCEOChairmanex-PwC
https://linkedin.com/in/chrisloeffler1
since since its inception

Sources: institution

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Mr. Loeffler earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.
value seen: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: full name

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
John C. “Chris” Loeffler, II
value seen: John C. “Chris” Loeffler, II
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

LinkedIn profile

LinkedIn
https://linkedin.com/in/chrisloeffler1
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/chrisloeffler1
https://linkedin.com/in/chrisloeffler1

Sources: previous companies

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Prior to forming Caliber, Mr. Loeffler was in the audit and assurance practice for PwC in Phoenix, Arizona.
value seen: PwC
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: since

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Mr. Loeffler has served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Caliber’s Board of Directors since its inception.
value seen: since its inception
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: summary

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Loeffler directs and executes the global strategy, oversees investments and fund management, and contributes to private and public capital formation.
value seen: Chris Loeffler is Caliber’s co-founder, CEO and board chair. He directs global strategy, investments and fund management, and contributes to private and public capital formation; before Caliber he worked in PwC’s audit and assurance practice.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: title

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
value seen: Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm
JS
Jennifer Schrader
Jennifer Schrader is a Caliber co-founder, president, COO and vice-chairperson. She leads daily operations and provides hands-on direction for construction and redevelopment; she has also overseen the acquisition, design, repositioning and disposition of more than $500 million in assets.
Current title
President & Chief Operating Officer and Vice-Chairperson
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
not published
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
Co-founderPresidentCOOVice-chairpersonArchitecture/design
https://linkedin.com/in/jennifer-schrader-566a0824

Sources: full name

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Jennifer Schrader
value seen: Jennifer Schrader
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

LinkedIn profile

LinkedIn
https://linkedin.com/in/jennifer-schrader-566a0824
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/jennifer-schrader-566a0824
https://linkedin.com/in/jennifer-schrader-566a0824

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

About - Caliber

Caliber
Jennifer is in charge of daily operations at Caliber and provides hands-on direction for all new construction and redevelopment projects across the company’s portfolio.
value seen: Jennifer Schrader is a Caliber co-founder, president, COO and vice-chairperson. She leads daily operations and provides hands-on direction for construction and redevelopment; she has also overseen the acquisition, design, repositioning and disposition of more than $500 million in assets.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.caliberco.com/about/

Sources: tags

COMPANYdate not shown in source

About - Caliber

Caliber
Chris Loeffler, Jennifer Schrader, and Donnie Schrader, Caliber’s founders, worked tirelessly...
value seen: Co-founder
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.caliberco.com/about/

Sources: tags

OTHERdate not shown in source

Jennifer Schrader, COO & Co-Founder | Caliber’s Asset Management and Daily Operations

Caliber Companies · carried by youtube.com
Our President and Co-Founder, Jennifer Schrader, has overseen the acquisition, design, repositioning, and disposition of over $500 million in assets.
value seen: President
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N15Lt3J9Lps

Sources: title

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
President & Chief Operating Officer and Vice-Chairperson
value seen: President & Chief Operating Officer and Vice-Chairperson
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm
GJ
Greg James
Greg James is Caliber’s COO, overseeing operational execution across hospitality, asset management, investment services, IT, human resources, and sales and marketing. He joined Caliber in October 2024 after nearly two decades at Summit Hotel Properties and began his career at Marriott International.
Current title
Chief Operating Officer
since July 7, 2025
Experience
34+ years hotel operations
Companies before
Summit Hotel PropertiesMarriott International
Education
Arizona State UniversityBA
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
COOex-Summit Hotel Propertiesex-Marriott
https://linkedin.com/in/greg-james-0239354b

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Caliber Promotes Greg James to Chief Operating Officer

Caliber
Greg James
value seen: Greg James
https://www.caliberco.com/caliber-promotes-greg-james-to-chief-operating-officer/

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

LinkedIn profile

LinkedIn
https://linkedin.com/in/greg-james-0239354b
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/greg-james-0239354b
https://linkedin.com/in/greg-james-0239354b

Sources: since

FILINGdate not shown in source

Document

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
The Executive Employment Agreement ... is effective as of the 7th day of July 2025.
value seen: July 7, 2025
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000087/a7152025_cwdx8-kxexx101.htm

Sources: summary

PRESSdate not shown in source

Caliber Promotes Greg James to Chief Operating Officer

Caliber
Mr. James brings over 34 years of experience in hotel operations and asset management. Prior to Caliber, he spent nearly two decades at Summit Hotel Properties ... He began his career in 1991 with Marriott International.
value seen: Greg James is Caliber’s COO, overseeing operational execution across hospitality, asset management, investment services, IT, human resources, and sales and marketing. He joined Caliber in October 2024 after nearly two decades at Summit Hotel Properties and began his career at Marriott International.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.caliberco.com/caliber-promotes-greg-james-to-chief-operating-officer/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Caliber Promotes Greg James to Chief Operating Officer

Caliber
Chief Operating Officer
value seen: Chief Operating Officer
https://www.caliberco.com/caliber-promotes-greg-james-to-chief-operating-officer/
RB
Roy Bade
Roy Bade is Caliber’s chief development officer, responsible for development, construction, acquisitions and project financing. Before joining Caliber in 2014, he spent nearly 30 years as principal/managing partner of Bade Commercial Services and BCS Development Group, developing, constructing and owning more than 750,000 square feet in the Phoenix area.
Current title
Chief Development Officer
since November 2019
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
Bade Commercial Services IncBCS Development Group, LLC
Education
Washington State UniversityBachelor of Science in Business Information Systems
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
Chief Development OfficerDevelopmentConstructionAcquisitionsProject financing
https://linkedin.com/in/roybade

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

ROY BADE - Caliber

Caliber
Roy Bade
value seen: Roy Bade
https://www.caliberco.com/roy-bade/

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

LinkedIn profile

LinkedIn
https://linkedin.com/in/roybade
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/roybade
https://linkedin.com/in/roybade

Sources: since

COMPANYdate not shown in source

ROY BADE - Caliber

Caliber
Roy Bade has served as the Chief Development Officer (“CDO”) of Caliber since November 2019.
value seen: November 2019
https://www.caliberco.com/roy-bade/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

ROY BADE - Caliber

Caliber
His four areas of responsibility include vertical and horizontal real estate development, construction, acquisitions, and project financing. For nearly 30 years prior to joining Caliber, Roy acted as the principal and managing partner of two businesses...
value seen: Roy Bade is Caliber’s chief development officer, responsible for development, construction, acquisitions and project financing. Before joining Caliber in 2014, he spent nearly 30 years as principal/managing partner of Bade Commercial Services and BCS Development Group, developing, constructing and owning more than 750,000 square feet in the Phoenix area.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.caliberco.com/roy-bade/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

ROY BADE - Caliber

Caliber
Chief Development Officer
value seen: Chief Development Officer
https://www.caliberco.com/roy-bade/
JL
Jade Leung
Jade Leung is Caliber’s CFO and corporate secretary, overseeing accounting, controllership, financial planning and analysis, tax, reporting and treasury. Before Caliber, he spent 12 years at PwC managing audit and accounting advisory services and participated in more than $1 billion of public-market transactions and financing arrangements.
Current title
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
since April 2017
Experience
12+ years at pwc
Companies before
PwC
Education
Ryerson UniversityAccounting degree
University of British ColumbiaBachelor of Arts in Psychology
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
CFOCorporate Secretaryex-PwC>$1B transactions

Sources: full name

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Jade Leung
value seen: Jade Leung
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: since

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Mr. Leung has served as Caliber’s Chief Financial Officer and corporate secretary since April 2017.
value seen: April 2017
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: summary

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
As Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Leung oversees all aspects of accounting and controllership, financial planning and analysis, tax, financial reporting, and treasury functions at Caliber. Prior to joining Caliber, Mr. Leung spent 12 years with PwC...
value seen: Jade Leung is Caliber’s CFO and corporate secretary, overseeing accounting, controllership, financial planning and analysis, tax, reporting and treasury. Before Caliber, he spent 12 years at PwC managing audit and accounting advisory services and participated in more than $1 billion of public-market transactions and financing arrangements.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: title

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
value seen: Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm
LX
Lawrence X. Taylor III
Lawrence Taylor is a Caliber director and an experienced C-level executive and adviser. He has led restructurings, acquisitions, corporate development and capital transactions totaling more than $20 billion across real estate, hospitality, aviation, manufacturing, retail and healthcare.
Current title
Director
since August 2023
Experience
30+ years business experience
Companies before
Taylor Strategy Group, LLCOdyssey Capital GroupGrand Casinos, Inc.Excorp Medical, Inc.
Education
Louisiana Tech UniversityBachelor’s degree in Finance
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
DirectorNACD Board Leadership FellowNACD Directorship Certified>$20B capital transactions
https://linkedin.com/in/lawrencextaylor

Sources: full name

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Lawrence X. Taylor III
value seen: Lawrence X. Taylor III
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

LinkedIn profile

LinkedIn
https://linkedin.com/in/lawrencextaylor
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/lawrencextaylor
https://linkedin.com/in/lawrencextaylor

Sources: since

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Mr. Taylor has been a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since August 2023.
value seen: August 2023
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

LAWRENCE X. TAYLOR - Caliber

Caliber
Mr. Taylor is a C-level executive, advisor, and board member with more than 30 years of business experience. He has guided organizations through complex restructurings, acquisitions, corporate development activities and capital transactions totaling over $20 billion.
value seen: Lawrence Taylor is a Caliber director and an experienced C-level executive and adviser. He has led restructurings, acquisitions, corporate development and capital transactions totaling more than $20 billion across real estate, hospitality, aviation, manufacturing, retail and healthcare.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.caliberco.com/lawrence-x-taylor/

Sources: title

FILINGdate not shown in source

2025 Caliber PROXY filing

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · carried by sec.gov
Director
value seen: Director
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1627282/000162728225000074/a2025caliberproxyfiling.htm

Projects

Assessment coverage

Completed projects: 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15. Initial research is capped at 10 completed projects and a separate delivery-risk search capped at 7 findings. Risk findings are not project assessment counts. Absence is not proof of a complete portfolio or no failures. Month-level dates overlapping a boundary are excluded from figures.

2 undated completions and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.

Stalled, cancelled & overdue projects

0 evidenced cases
The capped delivery-risk search ran; no project-level exception cases are recorded here. Risk findings are listed under Risks and are separate from assessed projects. This does not establish that the developer has no delivery failures.

Completed projects

6 projects
ProjectLocationTypeUnitsFloorsAreaCostPayment planLaunchedConstruction startOriginal targetHandoverDelayConfidenceStatus
Jordan LoftsBryan, United States
Downtown Bryan
residential for rent, retail, mixed use481——USD 9.96m
other
————Jun 2024—not scorablecompleted
Second Avenue CommonsMesa, United States
Downtown Mesa
residential for rent1441three—USD 32.5m
construction loan
—2021December 2, 2021Jan 2023 – Dec 2023Dec 2023+5.5 mo
(0.0 to +11.0)
sourcedcompleted
The Roosevelt – Phase ITempe, United States
Downtown Tempe
residential for rent151————2018May 16, 2018Dec 2018Aug 2020+20.0 mo
(+20.0 to +20.0)
estimatedcompleted
GC Square ApartmentsPhoenix, United States
Grand Canyon University
residential for rent1651——USD 7m
estimated cost
—2017November 15, 2017—Apr 2018—not scorablecompleted
Eclipse TownhomesScottsdale, United States
South Scottsdale
residential for sale2013—USD 9.1m
estimated cost
—2017May 25, 2017Dec 2017Jan 2018 – Dec 2018+6.5 mo
(+1.0 to +12.0)
sourcedcompleted
Hilton Tucson EastTucson, United States
East Tucson
hotel2321——USD 8m
estimated cost
—2017April 19, 2017Dec 2017Jan 2018 – Dec 2018+6.5 mo
(+1.0 to +12.0)
sourcedcompleted
Click any row for the sources behind it. Cost basis matters: an estimated cost, a construction loan and a sale price are different numbers. Each row states which one it is, so they are never averaged together.

Awards

Awards & recognition

6 found
PROJECT AWARD Winner 2021 award; reported September 26, 2022
Hilton Development Award · DoubleTree by Hilton Tucson Downtown
Hilton selected Caliber as a recipient of its 2021 Development Award for spearheading the ground-up development of DoubleTree by Hilton Tucson Downtown; Caliber served as construction manager and developer.
RANKING Ranked August 28, 2023
Top Companies to Work For in Arizona
Caliber was included in the 2023 Top Companies to Work For in Arizona list, based on employee-survey measures including culture, leadership, pride and satisfaction.
Arizona Capitol Times, Best Companies Group and BestCompaniesAZ · https://www.caliberco.com/caliber-named-a-top-company-to-work-for-in-arizona-by-bestcompaniesaz/
RANKING Ranked August 19, 2022
Top Companies to Work For in Arizona
Caliber was included in the 2022 Top Companies to Work For in Arizona list.
RANKING Ranked August 12, 2020
Inc. 5000 Fastest-Growing Private Companies in America
Caliber was reported as a 2020 Inc. 5000 honoree for the seventh consecutive year and ranked 4,881 nationally based on revenue growth from 2016 through 2019.
RANKING Ranked July 9, 2021
Arizona Top Workplaces 2021
Caliber was reported as an Arizona Top Workplaces 2021 award recipient, with selection based on workplace criteria and employee responses.
COMPANY AWARD Winner April 20, 2016
Commercial Investor of the Year
Think Realty Magazine named Caliber, The Wealth Development Company, its 2016 Commercial Investor of the Year for business practices and advancement of real-estate investing.

Risks

Auditor & credit ratings

audited accounts
AuditorDeloitte & Touche

Risk flags

7 found
FINANCIAL DISTRESS June 3, 2026 (bankruptcy filing); foreclosure filed July 2025; reported June 17, 2026
West Ridge HoldCo LLC, identified as an affiliate of Caliber, filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy on June 3, 2026, after failing to repay a $12 million seller-financed land loan; the lender had filed to foreclose and the bankruptcy paused the scheduled auction.
LEGAL Filed September 28, 2026; reported October 7, 2026
UMB Bank filed a federal lawsuit against CaliberCos Inc. on September 28, 2026, alleging uncured defaults by Caliber and its affiliate under a loan guaranty and seeking at least $3,672,271.97; these remain plaintiff allegations, not an adjudicated judgment.
DELIVERY DELAY Reported August 20, 2026 (updated August 25, 2026)
The former Four Points by Sheraton conversion in Ahwatukee remained unfinished as of August 20, 2026, with Maricopa County stating that Caliber’s building permit was on hold at the owner’s request and previously projected completion and occupancy milestones had passed unmet.
FINANCIAL DISTRESS Financial position as of March 31, 2026; filing accessed for the quarter ended March 31, 2026
In its SEC filing for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, CaliberCos disclosed recurring operating losses, negative operating cash flow, insufficient liquid assets to satisfy near-term note maturities, and substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern; management said its mitigation plans did not alleviate that doubt.
REGULATORY August 27, 2025 notice; resolved November 17, 2025
Nasdaq notified CaliberCos on August 27, 2025 that its stockholders’ equity was negative $17.604 million and below the $2.5 million continued-listing requirement; Nasdaq later determined on November 17, 2025 that the company had regained compliance and closed the matter.
DELIVERY DELAY Published August 20, 2026; updated August 25, 2026 (reported status as of publication)
Southpointe Apartments (SP10), CaliberCos’s Ahwatukee hotel-to-apartment conversion, remains unfinished and its Maricopa County building permit is on hold at the owner’s request; the project’s published late-2025 completion/occupancy milestones passed without being met, and the public record as of the report did not say when work would resume.
FINANCIAL DISTRESS Published June 17, 2026; bankruptcy filed June 3, 2026; loan reportedly due March 2025
West Ridge in Johnstown, Colorado, is a development planned by CaliberCos through affiliate West Ridge HoldCo LLC; the affiliate failed to repay a seller-financed $12 million loan due in March 2025, faced foreclosure, and filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in June 2026, which paused the foreclosure auction—this documents affiliate-level financial distress, not necessarily liability of CaliberCos beyond its reported affiliation.

Record status

active
Coverageactive
Tracked sinceOctober 10, 2026
Last checkedOctober 11, 2026 this month
Profile last researchedOctober 11, 2026
Claim
Work for this company? Claiming lets you correct the record with sources and get alerts when it changes.
For informational purposes only. This information is not investment, financial or credit advice and should not be relied on for investment, lending or credit decisions. Records may be incomplete or outdated. Verify information independently and seek qualified advice before making a decision.