A June 2026 operational review said that after more than three years, the towers’ structural frame, exterior paint and main electrical/water risers were still operating smoothly, with “no signs of major deterioration” in the technical infrastructure. It also noted longer elevator waits during the morning and evening peaks, while southwest-facing apartments receive direct late-afternoon summer sun and may need heat-control film or layered curtains.

Reviews describe Sky Oasis as “safe, clean and green,” “peaceful,” and suitable for remote work with a pool and gym. The June 2026 review says the base shophouses are now well occupied and that security, corridor cleaning, waste collection and landscaping are handled daily, but it also reports localised parking overload on evenings/weekends and longer elevator waits at peak times.

Published post-handover reporting says the buildings remained generally solid after two years, with “no ... nứt nẻ hay xuống cấp” in public areas and clean, well-kept lobbies. Guest reviews similarly describe apartments as “modern, clean and well designed”; however, the same 2026 report says weekend homestay demand can put pressure on elevators at peak times.

Guest feedback is strongly favorable: reviewers called the setting “a beautiful place to walk around,” praised the “great views,” and described the owner as helpful and thoughtful. Agoda reviewers repeatedly described the rooms as clean, fresh and fully equipped, although one building review says the price is high and the road is narrow enough that parked cars can impede movement.

Resident-facing review material is mixed: one review called the build quality “below average,” while another said “Hoàn thiện sảnh, hành lang và căn hộ ở mức tốt.” A July 2024 report described unfinished refuge/fire-safety areas, incomplete lifts and missing or damaged equipment during an early-May 2023 inspection; the same report says the competent authorities later accepted the completed-work inspection in May 2023, so the earlier defects should not be read as confirmed current conditions.

The day-to-day picture is polarized. Positive reviews describe Sol Forest as “đáng sống,” with a “thoáng mát” setting, greenery, water and convenient amenities; a negative review called it “a very poorly managed development,” said the pool and gym were closed, and complained that security was ineffective and the environment noisy.

Các nguồn đã đọc ghi nhận phản hồi tích cực về phần bàn giao và chất lượng căn hộ: một cư dân nói hài lòng với “tiến độ bàn giao đúng thời hạn” và “chất lượng xây dựng”, còn một bài khác ghi nhận các căn hộ rộng thoáng, có ánh sáng và thông gió tự nhiên. Đây chủ yếu là bằng chứng xuất bản trong giai đoạn 2019–2021, không phải kiểm định kỹ thuật độc lập hay xác nhận hiện trạng hệ thống vào ngày 2026-10-12.

The published resident accounts are strongly positive: one resident said the view was “không khác gì ở các resort hạng sang” (not unlike a luxury resort), while another said the green scenery, low management fee and services made quality of life better than in a central high-end apartment. A January 2026 review-style assessment adds current operational caveats—“thang máy có thể bị quá tải” at peak times and pools/parks can be crowded—so the evidence supports a good daily lifestyle but with old resident testimony and limited independent review depth.