Hong Leong Holdings develops Singapore residential communities, executive condominiums and commercial properties, including mixed-use projects, for mass-market, mid-market and higher-end homebuyers and commercial occupiers seeking quality, contemporary urban living.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
| Project | Overall | Structure & systems | Management & living |
|---|---|---|---|
| PenroseDistrict 14, Singapore566 units | 9.2/ 10 | 7.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9. | 7.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9. |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest review base, with 4.8/5 from 26 reviews, converting to about 9.4/10 and setting the level. The score is reduced for the serious reported workmanship/leaking-pipes complaint and partly restored for repeated praise of accessibility, facilities, landscaping and design. The structure sub-score is lower than the living score because the published evidence includes a major defects report alongside positive design and finishing comments. | |||
Structural evidence is mixed. One September 2025 owner review said, “The workmanship of the condo finishing is lacking, alot of defects including major ones like leaking pipes,” while other published comments praised the “well thought out design,” “good finishes,” and lush landscaping. A 2020 review also warned that some expressway-facing layouts may have noise exposure and that only about 25% of some bedroom window surfaces can open, potentially limiting ventilation; these are design observations, not evidence of a completed failure. | Residents and reviewers consistently praise the location: one called daily living easy because the MRT, wet market, hawker centre and coffee shops are close, while another praised the gym, shaded pool and family-friendly layout. The main operational criticism in the newer Google material is that the lobby “need[s] to improve,” with dark lighting and an appearance likened to HDB; the older 2020 review also cautioned that some facilities could be underutilized and that the PIE-facing adventure park could be noisy. | ||
| The JovellDistrict 17, Singapore428 units | 9.1/ 10 | 7.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5, 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg Combined from 2 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.9. | 7.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg Combined from 5 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.9. |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest published review base for the building, at 4.6/5 from 52 reviews, which converts to 8.8/10 before commentary. The reviewed Google-derived material is strongly positive on peace, landscaping, pool and facilities, so the reported recurring praise adds approximately 0.3 points; there was no evidence to score structural systems separately. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Published reviews repeatedly describe The Jovell as “quiet and peaceful” and praise the “amazing pool and landscaping,” with residents described as “friendly and approachable.” A 2025 resident review said the facilities were “brand-new and well-maintained” and highlighted the long beach-like pool and children’s play area; no recurring management, security or upkeep complaint was found in the reviewed material. | ||
| MidwoodHillview Rise, Singapore564 units | 8.3/ 10 | 7.4/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · 1 review · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 from 1 review. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.4. | 7.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · 1 review · propertyguru.com.sg Midwood Management Office (Google Reviews/Maps) 5/5 · 1 review · exa.ai Combined from 2 published figures on 2 platforms, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.9. |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest published building-specific review base at 4.4/5 from 23 reviews, which converts to 8.2/10 under the supplied curve. The sampled reviews contain both praise and isolated operational complaints, but no severe failure and no complaint theme supported by more than one separate reviewer, so no commentary adjustment is applied. PropertyGuru and the management-office rating are reported but excluded from the score. | |||
The published building review describes a brightly lit carpark with “Good signage,” but criticises the lack of dedicated carpark-to-unit access as “unacceptable” and more arduous for residents with mobility issues. It also notes privacy screens that restrict some views and generally compact unit dimensions; no published source reviewed here reports leaks, flooding, plumbing, HVAC or electrical failures. | Residents repeatedly praise “surrounding nature & tranquility,” the infinity pool, nearby mall and food amenities, and a short walk to MRT; another review says the guards are “very friendly.” The operational evidence is mixed: one resident reports “Lousy management/security” because guests must walk, while another calls waste disposal a hassle because the designated bin area is more than 100m away. | ||
| Forest Woods19, Singapore519 units | 7.8/ 10 | —/ 10 | 6.8/ 10 EdgeProp Singapore 4/5, 4.2/5, 4.2/5 · no review count · edgeprop.sg Combined from 3 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.8. |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest published review base at 4.2/5 from 94 reviews, which converts to 7.6/10 under the specified curve. 99.co is more positive at 4.5/5 from 20 reviews but does not replace the larger anchor; published commentary is broadly positive about facilities and convenience, with some operational and siting drawbacks. | |||
The published material does not provide an engineering or systems condition assessment. A 2017/2020 property review says “Materials and fittings are just average” and identifies units near public electrical substations, while also warning that blocks facing the major roads may be noisy and dusty; these are observations about specification and siting rather than evidence of structural failure. | Resident-facing reviews are generally favorable: one called the development “Spacious, Stylish, and Clean,” and another said the pool was “quite picturesque” and “like living in a resort.” The same resident said staff were “blunt and lack of politeness” but effective, while another complained that security did not allow food-delivery riders to ride in and made them walk around the carpark. | ||
| Piermont GrandPunggol820 units | 7.7/ 10 | —/ 10 | 7.7/ 10 |
The Google Reviews/Maps building aggregate of 4.2/5 from 66 reviews sets the level, converting to 7.7/10 under the specified curve. Written feedback is predominantly positive about scenery, facilities, convenience, neighbours, security and staff, but recurring operational criticism concerns management follow-up, parking and upkeep; no physical-system evidence supports a structure score. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Residents commonly praise the waterfront setting, facilities, neighbours and convenience; one review calls it “a very nice place” with professional security, while another praises responsive management and friendly staff. The negative feedback is operational: a resident described the MCST/MA as having “0 follow up, 0 resolutions” and complained about carpark issues, litter, landscaping and resident communication; another said the place was “managed wrongly” because of parking pressure. | ||
| Midtown ModernD7, Singapore558 units | 7.1/ 10 | 5.0/ 10 | 7.1/ 10 |
Google Reviews/Maps supplies the largest clearly published building-specific review aggregate, 4.1/5 from 39 reviews, which converts to 7.3 on the requested curve. Recent written complaints about lifts, common-area condition, noise and serious carpark water/sewage incidents pull the score down, while repeated praise for Bugis MRT access, greenery and practical layouts partly offsets that movement. The structure subscore is lower at 5.0 because the physical-condition evidence is anecdotal and includes severe but single-review failures. | |||
Published resident-facing reviews report physical-condition concerns including “carpark leaking water” and a separate observation of a carpark pipe burst that left a car and bike “covered with shit.” One reviewer also said several elevators were “always out of service” and that the buttons did not respond well. These are anecdotal reports rather than an engineering assessment, and the evidence is recent but limited. | Daily-life praise centres on convenience: one reviewer called the location “excellent” and said it is directly above Bugis MRT, while another described the greenery as “a mini garden in a garden city.” The negative operational feedback is material: a resident reported paint-stained facilities, poor corridors, frequent lift outages and “unfriendly and condescending” concierges; another reported renovation noise from “9:20 to 6.” | ||
| The AvenirDistrict 9, Singapore376 units | 7.1/ 10 | 7.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9. | 7.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · 3 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9. |
Google’s 4.1/5 building rating from 16 reviews is the largest qualifying review base and converts to an anchor of 7.3/10. The score is moved down for repeated rainwater/flooding complaints and weak security reports, partly offset by repeated praise for the facilities and spacious family-oriented design. Structural confidence is lower than living confidence because the positive structural material is mostly pre-completion expectation, while the post-completion physical-condition reports are negative. | |||
Later Google feedback raises physical-condition concerns: one reviewer said, “Units can be leaky during heavy rain,” and another said, “Water floods the lift lobbies when it rains.” A separate review called the build quality “questionable”; the positive structural evidence is limited and largely consists of pre-completion PropertyGuru expectations of high-quality construction and interiors, not verified post-completion performance. | The positive material emphasizes the facilities and family experience: a Google reviewer called it a “Nice posh condo,” while PropertyGuru reviews praise the spacious layouts, roof garden and luxury living. The more recent operational feedback is less favorable: reviewers describe guards as unprofessional, say “security is lacking,” report lobby-gate hiccups, and mention noise from the nearby school. | ||
| Boulevard 8810, Singapore154 units | 6.5/ 10 | —/ 10 | 6.4/ 10 |
The largest qualifying review base located is the Google Reviews/Maps aggregate of 3.8/5 from 21 reviews, which converts to 6.4/10 under the specified curve. The written comments support strong design, views, pool and location appeal, but recurring operational complaints about security, visitor handling and concierge service temper the resident-living assessment. Physical structure and systems were not scored because the reviewed material did not publish a meaningful engineering or systems assessment. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Published reviews repeatedly praise the luxury presentation, Orchard location, spaciousness, views and rooftop infinity pool: one calls it “mini MBS in orchard road,” while another says the condo is “very well-maintained.” The operational feedback is less consistent: reviewers describe security staff as having the “worst attitude,” report visitor-procedure problems, and say the concierge team should provide “more rounded service and assistance.” | ||
| Springdale ParkLongquanyi District, Chengdu567 units | 5.3/ 10 | —/ 10 | 5.3/ 10 |
No applicable platform aggregate rating was found; the 5.3 score therefore follows the written-review rule from the 11 comments actually read, with five positive, four negative and two mixed/neutral. The evidence is limited and largely pre- or near-completion sales-platform commentary, so it should not be treated as a current resident-quality survey as of 2026-10-12. | |||
The reviews contain limited physical-condition evidence rather than engineering or systems reporting. Positive observations include “房子修得漂亮！不错户型也可以” and “园林景观还不错,” while one reviewer said the buildings were “楼栋很密集，楼与楼间距很近”; no published review evidence was found on plumbing, HVAC, electrical systems, leaks or waterproofing. | Daily-life feedback is mixed and mostly comes from sales-platform user comments rather than verified resident reviews. Reviewers described the environment as suitable for people who like quietness and praised the landscaping, but others called the project “太偏” and complained “没地铁”; the 58 房产 page also says current travel mainly relies on driving and buses, with metro access some distance away. |
Together with Hong Leong Holdings' subsidiary Intrepid Investments and CSC Land, it participates in the acquisition, development and dealing of the Tengah Garden Avenue land parcel.
It is a JV partner with GuocoLand and Hong Leong Holdings' subsidiary Intrepid Investments for the Tengah Garden Avenue development.
Hong Leong Holdings' wholly owned subsidiary holds the Hong Leong side of the joint venture for the acquisition, development and dealing of the Tengah Garden Avenue land parcel.
The authority accepted the consortium's tender for the Tengah Garden Avenue land parcel.
Hong Leong Group's TID property venture is described as a joint venture with Mitsui Fudosan for Singapore property development.
The tender submitted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, GuocoLand (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“GLS”), together with Intrepid Investments Pte. Ltd. (“Intrepid”) and CSC Land Group (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“CSC Land”)
Pursuant to the terms of the MOGA, the rights and obligations of the Parties in the joint venture (“JV”) for the acquisition, development and dealing of the Land Parcel will be participated by the Parties in the Agreed Proportion.
the rights and obligations of the Parties in the joint venture (“JV”) for the acquisition, development and dealing of the Land Parcel will be participated by the Parties in the Agreed Proportion.
The tender submitted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, GuocoLand (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“GLS”), together with Intrepid Investments Pte. Ltd. (“Intrepid”) and CSC Land Group (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“CSC Land”)
Pursuant to the terms of the MOGA, the rights and obligations of the Parties in the joint venture (“JV”) for the acquisition, development and dealing of the Land Parcel will be participated by the Parties in the Agreed Proportion.
the rights and obligations of the Parties in the joint venture (“JV”) for the acquisition, development and dealing of the Land Parcel will be participated by the Parties in the Agreed Proportion.
The tender submitted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, GuocoLand (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“GLS”), together with Intrepid Investments Pte. Ltd. (“Intrepid”) and CSC Land Group (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“CSC Land”)
Intrepid is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hong Leong Holdings Limited (“HLHL”)
Tengah Garden Residences is jointly developed by Hong Leong Holdings, GuocoLand and CSC Land Group.
the tender ... has been accepted by the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Singapore at a bid price of S$675,000,000.
the tender submitted ... has been accepted by the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Singapore
The tender submitted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, GuocoLand (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“GLS”), together with Intrepid Investments Pte. Ltd. (“Intrepid”) and CSC Land Group (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (“CSC Land”) ... has been accepted by the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Singapore
TID Pte Ltd. is a joint venture between Hong Leong Group and Mitsui Fudosan, Japan's largest private developer.
TID Pte Ltd. is a joint venture between Hong Leong Group and Mitsui Fudosan, Japan's largest private developer.
TID Pte Ltd. is a joint venture between Hong Leong Group and Mitsui Fudosan, Japan's largest private developer.
| COMPANY NUMBER | 196800290Z Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) · Singapore · Active |
| Singapore | active 9 projects tracked |
| China | unknown 1 project tracked |
| Residential, for sale | 10 of 10 |
| Retail | 2 of 10 |
| Mixed use | 2 of 10 |
| Hotel | 1 of 10 |
Mr Kwek holds a law degree, LL.B. (London)
He was also conferred an Honorary Doctorate of Business Administration in Hospitality from Johnson & Wales University (Rhode Island, US)
and an Honorary Doctorate from Oxford Brookes University (UK).
## KWEK LENG BENG **EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN** **Hong Leong Group Singapore**
He is the Chairman and Managing Director of Hong Leong Finance Limited.
He helped set up Hong Leong Finance, currently Singapore’s largest finance company and an SME Specialist, and in Hong Leong Holdings, developing private housing and enabling home buyers to realize their dreams.
## KWEK LENG BENG **EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN** **Hong Leong Group Singapore**
Director and shareholder of Hong Leong Holdings Limited, Hong Realty (Private) Limited, Hong Leong Investment Holdings Pte. Ltd. (“HLIH”) and Kwek Holdings Pte Ltd (“KH”), all of which are substantial shareholders of the Company.
Quek Leng Chye is managing director of Singapore's Hong Leong Holdings, a property development and investment arm of diversified conglomerate Hong Leong Group.
Quek Leng Chye is managing director of Singapore's Hong Leong Holdings, a property development and investment arm of diversified conglomerate Hong Leong Group.
Quek Leng Chye is managing director of Singapore's Hong Leong Holdings
Quek Leng Chye is managing director of Singapore's Hong Leong Holdings, a property development and investment arm of diversified conglomerate Hong Leong Group.
# Kon Hui Quek
With extensive experience in corporate leadership and strategic management, Quek plays a key role in overseeing the company's operations and growth initiatives.
With extensive experience in corporate leadership and strategic management, Quek plays a key role in overseeing the company's operations and growth initiatives.
Executive Director, Hong Leong Holdings
# Kwek Leng Kee
Tripartite Developers Pte. Limited (Director)
Intrepid Investments Pte. Limited (Managing Director)
He continues to be a director of Beijing Hong Gong Garden Villa House Property Development Co., Ltd.
Mr Kwek has more than 40 years of experience in property investment, property development and the building and construction materials business.
As the Assistant Managing Director of HLH, he spearheaded the establishment, and oversees the operation, of its subsidiary in Chengdu, People's Republic of China since 2012.
Hong Leong Holdings Limited ("HLH") (Assistant Managing Director)
# Kwek Leng Peck
China Yuchai International Limited* (Non-Executive Director)
Tasek Corporation Berhad (Non-Executive Chairman)
Hong Leong Investment Holdings Pte. Ltd. (Executive Director)
Hong Leong Corporation Holdings Pte. Ltd. (Executive Director)
Mr Kwek has many years of experience in property investment and development, hotel operations, trading, manufacturing, corporate finance and management as well as extensive involvement in Hong Leong Group, Singapore's real estate developments, investments and hotel operations.
Hong Leong Asia Ltd. ("HLA") (Executive Chairman)
Hong Leong Asia Ltd. ("HLA") (Executive Chairman)
# Andre Wong
# Andre Wong
May 2024 - Present (2 years and 5 months) in Singapore
### Project Manager - [HONG LEONG HOLDINGS LIMITED](https://www.linkedin.com/company/hong-leong-holdings-limited) (Current)
Department: Project Management • Level: Manager
### Project Manager - [HONG LEONG HOLDINGS LIMITED](https://www.linkedin.com/company/hong-leong-holdings-limited) (Current)
0 undated completions and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.
| Project | Location | Type | Units | Floors | Area | Cost | Payment plan | Launched | Construction start | Original target | Handover | Delay | Confidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Avenir | Singapore, Singapore District 9 | residential for sale | 3761 | 36 | — | — | 5% (Booking Fee) / 20% less Booking Fee / 10% / 10% / 5% / 5% / 5% / 5% / 25% / 15%1 | 2020 | 11 January 2020 | Aug 2025 | Jul 2025 | −1.0 mo (−1.0 to −1.0) | sourced | completed |
| Midtown Modern | Singapore, Singapore D7 | residential for sale, retail, mixed use | 5581 | 30 storeys | 50,144.4 m² | — | 5% (Booking Fee), 20% less Booking Fee, 10%, 10%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 25%, 15%1 | 2021 | 20 March 2021 | Jan 2024 – Dec 2024 | Jan 2025 – Dec 2025 | +12.0 mo (+1.0 to +23.0) | sourced | completed |
| Penrose | Singapore, Singapore District 14 | residential for sale | 5661 | 18 | — | — | Normal Payment Scheme (NPS)1 | 2020 | September 26 and 27 | Oct 2025 | Jan 2025 – Dec 2025 | −3.5 mo (−9.0 to +2.0) | sourced | completed |
| One-North Eden | Singapore, Singapore | residential for sale, retail, mixed use | 1651 | — | — | — | 5% booking fee; next 20%; remaining payment progressively during construction1 | 2021 | April 24 | Dec 2024 | May 2024 | −7.0 mo (−7.0 to −7.0) | sourced | completed |
| Midwood | Singapore, Singapore Hillview Rise | residential for sale | 5641 | 29-storeys | — | — | 5% booking fee; 20% on signing; 10%/10%/5%/5%/5%/5% during construction; 25% at TOP; 15% final1 | — | — | — | Aug 2023 | — | not scorable | completed |
| Boulevard 88 | Singapore, Singapore 10 | residential for sale, hotel | 1541 | 28 | — | — | Normal Payment Scheme (NPS)1 | 2019 | 8 March 2019 | Jan 2022 – Dec 2022 | Jan 2023 – Dec 2023 | +12.0 mo (+1.0 to +23.0) | sourced | completed |
| Piermont Grand | Punggol, Singapore | residential for sale | 8201 | — | — | — | Normal Payment Scheme (NPS)1 | 2019 | 27 July 2019 | Feb 2023 | Jan 2023 – Dec 2023 | +4.5 mo (−1.0 to +10.0) | sourced | completed |
| The Jovell | Singapore, Singapore District 17 | residential for sale | 4281 | 8 storeys | — | — | Booking Fee 5%; Rest of Downpayment 15%; Foundation 5%; Framework 10%; Brick Walls 5%; Ceiling 5%; Door, Windows 5%; Carpark, Roads 5%; T.O.P. 25%; C.S.C. 15%1 | 2018 | Sept 29 | — | Jan 2022 – Dec 2022 | — | not scorable | completed |
| Springdale Park | Chengdu, China Longquanyi District | residential for sale | 5671 | — | 118,000 m² | RMB 1.4bn investment announced | — | 2018 | 15 September 2018 | Jan 2020 – Dec 2020 | Jan 2021 – Dec 2021 | +12.0 mo (+1.0 to +23.0) | sourced | completed |
| Forest Woods | Singapore, Singapore 19 | residential for sale | 5191 | 12 storeys | — | — | — | 2016 | 8 October 2016 | May 2021 | Jan 2020 – Dec 2020 | more than 9 months early | estimated | completed |
| Coverage | active |
| Tracked since | October 11, 2026 |
| Last checked | October 12, 2026 this month |
| Profile last researched | October 12, 2026 |
| Claim |