Hung Thinh develops residential, resort, hospitality, commercial and mixed-use projects across Vietnam, serving homebuyers, investors, visitors and communities. Its integrated model combines land investment, development, construction, sales, technology, commercial operations, tourism and hospitality management within a private real-estate ecosystem.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
| Project | Overall | Structure & systems | Management & living |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lavita CharmTP.HCM939 units | 9.0/ 10 | 6.7/ 10 The Landmark 81 4/5 · no review count · thelandmark81.com.vn The Landmark 81 publishes 4/5 with no review count. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 6.7. | 5.9/ 10 The Landmark 81 3.5/5, 3/5 · no review count · thelandmark81.com.vn Combined from 2 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 5.9. |
The 4.6/5 building aggregate from 221 reviews sets the level and converts to 8.8/10. Repeated positive comments about living quality support a modest upward adjustment, while the article's 4/5 structural assessment is used as the separate structure score; the editorial 3.5/5 and 3/5 living ratings are not used to overturn the much larger resident-review base. | |||
The January 2026 review article rates building quality 4/5 and says that after several years the technical systems remain stable. It reports that the elevators operate stably, but residents may wait longer at peak times because of high occupancy; it also says the fire-protection system is inspected periodically. | Displayed resident reviews call the project a “Great place to live,” “Super comfortable, peaceful, high-quality and convenient,” and praise “friendly security.” The January 2026 review describes 24/24 cameras and guards, but notes relatively dense occupancy, somewhat cramped space between blocks, basic gym/spa facilities, and a 3/5 amenities assessment. | ||
| Richmond CityBình Thạnh, TP. HCM880 units | 8.6/ 10 | 8.0/ 10 | 8.6/ 10 |
The only building-specific published aggregate located was the guest-stay score of 9.6/10 from 8 reviews, which converts to 9.2 under the supplied guest-rating curve but cannot serve as a full-strength anchor because it has fewer than 10 reviews. The result is therefore moderated toward the prescribed 6.5 reference point and reduced modestly for documented stadium noise and traffic, while the evidence supports a stronger living assessment than structural evidence. | |||
Nguồn đánh giá thực tế năm 2021–2023 mô tả “kết cấu công trình ổn định và không có các hiện tượng tiêu cực”, đồng thời cho rằng hệ thống tiện ích và dịch vụ được bảo trì, bảo dưỡng tốt. Tuy nhiên, bài đánh giá năm 2020 ghi nhận đường kè ven sông chưa hoàn thành và một số khu thương mại còn đang chuẩn bị bàn giao; đây là bằng chứng cũ về giai đoạn hoàn thiện, không phải xác nhận tình trạng hiện tại. | Phản hồi của cư dân trên VnExpress nói quản lý “khá tốt”, sảnh và hành lang “luôn được lau sạch sẽ”, rác hiếm khi đầy thùng, và ba thang máy “đủ để di chuyển và không phải đợi lâu”; bài này cũng khen hồ bơi, công viên ven sông, gym và các dịch vụ quanh nhà. Mặt trái rõ nhất là tiếng ồn sân vận động: cư dân cho biết âm thanh cuối tuần có thể đánh thức họ và các liveshow đôi khi ảnh hưởng đến giấc ngủ; một nguồn khác ghi nhận khu giao hàng từng lộn xộn, có nhiều trường hợp hàng bị xử lý sai hoặc thất lạc. | ||
| SaigonMiaQuận 7, TP.HCM869 units | 8.6/ 10 | 7.8/ 10 Nhà Tốt 8.8/10 · 350 reviews · nhatot.com Nhà Tốt publishes 8.8/10 from 350 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.8. | 7.9/ 10 Nhà Tốt 9.5/10, 7.8/10, 9.2/10, 9/10 · 350 reviews · nhatot.com Combined from 4 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.9. |
Nhà Tốt has the largest resident review base reported here, with 9.0/10 from 350 reviews; under the stated curve this sets an 8.0/10 anchor. The reported 8.8/10 construction sub-score supports the structure figure, while repeated praise for amenities, community, security and management lifts the overall result modestly; the negative themes are minor. | |||
Nhà Tốt công bố điểm “Chất lượng xây dựng” 8.8/10. Một bài trải nghiệm cư dân cho biết “Hệ thống điện, nước, điều hòa, internet… hoạt động ổn định” và các vấn đề như “nước yếu, thấm trần hay hư thiết bị” được xử lý sau vài giờ; đây là phản ánh đơn lẻ, không phải bằng chứng độc lập về mọi căn hộ. | Các bài review mô tả đời sống hàng ngày tích cực: hồ bơi “sạch sẽ, có bảo trì mỗi tuần”, bảo vệ “lịch sự, thân thiện” và ban quản lý “xử lý sự cố nhanh”. Mặt trái được nêu là phí quản lý cao hơn mặt bằng chung và ùn tắc giờ cao điểm; Nhà Tốt cũng ghi một cư dân nói “Mọi thứ đều ổn” nhưng vẫn trừ điểm vì hai vấn đề này. | ||
| Q7 BoulevardQuận 7, TP.HCM1,008 units | 7.9/ 10 | —/ 10 | 7.9/ 10 |
Google Reviews/Maps là anchor vì có 142 review và công bố 4.4/5, tương ứng 8.2/10 theo đường chuyển đổi được yêu cầu. Điểm được kéo xuống bởi hai phản ánh riêng về ngập và đường vào xuống cấp, rồi bù một phần bởi các lời khen lặp lại về hồ bơi, tiện ích và nhân viên; không có đủ bằng chứng riêng để chấm điểm kết cấu. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Các review mô tả hồ bơi là “PEAK”, rộng và ấm, đồng thời khen nhân viên thân thiện; một review khác ghi nhận hồ bơi nước mặn, khu vui chơi trẻ em, chỗ để xe rộng và căn hộ sạch. Mặt trái được nêu khá cụ thể: đường vào có lúc ngập “hơn bánh xe”, sau khi nước rút “ổ voi ổ gà”; một cư dân cũng viết “BQL không ổn” và hỗ trợ cư dân rất kém. | ||
| Moonlight Park ViewBình Tân, Ho Chi Minh City463 units | 7.7/ 10 | —/ 10 | 7.7/ 10 |
The 4.3/5 aggregate from 56 reviews sets the level and converts to 7.9/10 under the requested curve. The score is reduced for repeated false-fire-alarm and management/security complaints, partly offset by repeated praise for clean, airy common areas, amenities and location; no independent platform with a comparable published rating was found. | |||
Published material describes the complex as clean, airy and well laid out; one reviewer called it “sạch đẹp rộng rãi thoáng mát,” while another praised its “chất lượng xây dựng.” Against that, resident commentary reports recurring false fire alarms and, separately, lift problems; these are operational reports rather than an engineering inspection, so the current physical condition remains uncertain. | The strongest positive resident feedback says the complex is “sạch đẹp rộng rãi thoáng mát,” with a pool, internal park and convenient services; another calls the living environment and location “rất ổn.” The main negative is operational: a reviewer called it “TERRIBLE MANAGEMENT!” because alarms allegedly sounded “almost every day,” including at 3 a.m.; another said security was “petty” and not acting in tenants’ interests. | ||
| Cam Ranh Mystery VillasCam Lam District241 units | 7.6/ 10 | 7.7/ 10 Trip.com 8.7/10 · 36 reviews · trip.com Traveloka 9.4/10 · 21 reviews · traveloka.com Combined from 2 published figures on 2 platforms, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.7. | 7.5/ 10 Trip.com 8.9/10, 8.7/10, 8.7/10 · 36 reviews · trip.com Traveloka 9.2/10, 8.7/10, 9.2/10, 9.1/10 · 21 reviews · traveloka.com Combined from 7 published figures on 2 platforms, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.5. |
The largest reported review base is Vio/Hotels.com at 8.3/10 from 228 guest reviews, which sets the level at 6.6 on the requested guest-rating conversion. Google’s 4.7/5 result is materially higher but has a smaller base, while repeated guest reports of pests, housekeeping/towel shortcomings and late-checkout communication reduce the score to 6.1; no separate engineering evidence supports a structure score. | |||
Published reviews describe spacious, well-equipped villas, private pools and generally good grounds; one reviewer said the villa was “clean” and that “everything was superb.” Physical-condition complaints include “huge cockroaches,” swarms of ants, an unclean pool-water report, bad smells in villas and beach litter; these are guest observations rather than an engineering inspection. | Daily-life feedback is strongest on service and amenities: reviewers call staff “friendly and responsive,” while another says the butlers were “very helpful and provided fast service.” The counter-evidence includes “service and communication terrible” over late checkout, repeated complaints about insufficient towels, limited electric carts, and unclear or slow responses to pest-control requests. | ||
| Q7 Saigon Riverside Complex — residential tower cluster (U, M, S, V)Quận 7, TP. Hồ Chí Minh3,580 units | 5.9/ 10 | —/ 10 | 5.6/ 10 |
The Google/Maps aggregate of 3.6/5 from 212 reviews is the anchor, converting to 5.8/10 under the specified curve. Recurring moderate complaints about management and noise outweigh the smaller positive adjustment for the spacious, green internal environment and amenities, producing 5.6/10; no defensible structure score is assigned. | |||
Published handover material describes fire-rated doors, anti-moisture bedroom flooring, Toto sanitary fixtures and completed electrical/appliance fit-out; a separate review describes the Mitsubishi elevators as “khá mượt.” Resident commentary also reports poor sound insulation and one Google review says “The fire alarm constantly goes off”; these are operational observations, not evidence of a confirmed structural failure. | Daily-life feedback is mixed. Positive comments call it a “Beautiful, clean place close to the river,” describe the internal grounds as “mát mẻ rộng rãi,” and praise the pool; negative reviews say “the management fee is as high as vinhomes but they don’t do their job here,” while a resident reports complaints about parking and cleaning were handled “lề mề.” | ||
| 9View ApartmentDistrict 9, Ho Chi Minh City690 units | 5.8/ 10 | —/ 10 | 4.1/ 10 |
The Google listing’s 3.3/5 from 30 reviews sets the level and converts to 4.6/10 under the supplied curve. The score is reduced for the reported security incident and recurring resident complaints about smoke/odour and night-time alarms, with a small offset for repeated praise of the green, clean common areas and apartment quality. Structural scoring remains null because no reliable building-specific structural aggregate or sub-score was published. | |||
The available reviews describe the building fabric positively in places: one reviewer said the apartment was “spacious and clean,” while a later resident review reported that the elevators were well maintained and the construction quality was “khá ok.” Counterevidence is operational/environmental rather than a confirmed framework failure: residents reported repeated night-time fire alarms, and a 2024 report documented persistent smoke, dust and odour complaints around the complex; authorities also recorded unresolved shortcomings in a nearby factory’s emissions-control systems. | Daily-life feedback is sharply mixed. Positive excerpts call the property “green,” “quiet,” clean and well serviced, while negative resident reporting describes repeated odour and smoke problems since 2019 and a review says security was “very bad” because management did not help; another resident reported fire alarms sounding loudly at night. | ||
| Moonlight BoulevardBinh Tan District, HCMC656 units | 5.4/ 10 | —/ 10 | 5.1/ 10 |
The Google Reviews/Maps aggregate of 3.5/5 from 48 reviews sets the level and converts to 5.5/10 under the requested curve. Repeated complaints about rude or aggressive security and constrained parking justify a modest downward adjustment; the available physical-condition evidence is design commentary rather than a scored structural rating. | Not found in sources: Limited internal amenities at the time of the 2020 review | ||
A September 2020 project review described the handover as “tươm tất áo mới,” praised the fan-shaped design for ventilation and called the 1.6 m corridors relatively wide. It also said the 96 m² three-bedroom units were largely obstructed in view and that the single-bedroom type lacked a balcony; these are design observations, not evidence of structural failure. No published review located here reports flooding, plumbing, HVAC, electrical or lift failures. | Day-to-day feedback is uneven. Residents described Block A security as not helpful and “gằn giọng,” while another reviewer alleged guards requested money for vehicle entry; a separate review said loud music, karaoke, roosters and dogs mean “the concept of peace and quiet is missing here.” Positives include convenient access to other districts and one reviewer’s comment about “Friendly guards, nice people, lovely pets,” although that same review criticized the small park and unresolved ownership certificates. | ||
| Moonlight ResidencesQuận Thủ Đức, TP.HCM535 units | 5.3/ 10 | —/ 10 | 4.9/ 10 |
The building-specific aggregate of 3.3/5 from 86 reviews sets the level; applying the requested market conversion gives 4.9/10. The displayed written reviews include repeated complaints about parking/security and service response, alongside a smaller set of positive residence comments, so the commentary adjustment is modest rather than a wholesale override. The legal and title-certificate reporting is material context but is not treated as a published resident rating. | |||
Published reporting does not provide a conventional engineering or building-fabric review, but it records material project-level legal and physical-use issues. The residents’ management board said 535 apartments had delayed title certificates; authorities also ordered restoration after unauthorized changes to shared/non-residential areas and unpermitted internal roads, with the 2023 report stating that corrective action had not yet been completed. | The strongest recent resident feedback is negative: reviewers described parking/security staff as “láo thật sự” and said the technical hotline was unreachable, while the building listing also records “Good residence” and “Beautifulyyyyyyyyyy” 5/5 comments. Independent local coverage praises the convenient location and comparatively accessible rents, but reports that access roads can become a “biển nước” during heavy rain; these are operational/location observations rather than evidence that the building itself floods. |
Representative office in Hanoi: VCCI Tower, 9 Dao Duy Anh Street, Bach Mai Ward, Ha Noi
Representative office in Quy Nhon: Lot K20 - Hung Thinh Residential Area - Che Lan Vien Area 3, Quy Nhon Nam Ward, Gia Lai Province
Representative office in Vung Tau: Floor M, Vung Tau Melody Apartment, 149 Vo Thi Sau Street, Vung Tau Ward, HCMC
Representative office in Bao Loc: 169A Nguyen Cong Tru Street, 2 Bao Loc Ward, Lam Dong Province
Strategic cooperation covers digital elevator and escalator products and smart-connection solutions for Hung Thinh projects, first at MerryLand Quy Nhon.
The parties signed hotel operation-management cooperation and broke ground on Marriott Quy Nhon Resort & Spa at MerryLand Quy Nhon.
Strategic cooperation covers construction and infrastructure, including joint bidding, investment and construction of infrastructure projects.
Under the agreement, KONE Vietnam will become a strategic partner to provide digital elevator and escalator products KONE DX and smart connection solutions KONE 24/7 ... in projects that have been and will be developed by Hung Thinh Corporation.
strategic partner to provide digital elevator and escalator products
Under the agreement, KONE Vietnam will become a strategic partner to provide digital elevator and escalator products KONE DX and smart connection solutions KONE 24/7 ... in projects that have been and will be developed by Hung Thinh Corporation.
This event opens a period of extensive cooperation between Hung Thinh Corporation and Marriott International in management and operation of series of Marriott branded hotels in the future.
management and operation of series of Marriott branded hotels
This event opens a period of extensive cooperation between Hung Thinh Corporation and Marriott International in management and operation of series of Marriott branded hotels in the future.
two Parties will apply joint venture, association in bidding, investment and construction of infrastructure projects and construction projects
joint venture, association in bidding, investment and construction of infrastructure projects
two Parties will apply joint venture, association in bidding, investment and construction of infrastructure projects and construction projects
| COMPANY NUMBER | 0305410561 Vietnam tax/enterprise registration authority · VN · Active |
| Vietnam | active 0 projects tracked |
| Residential, for sale | 10 of 10 |
| Retail | 6 of 10 |
| Office | 5 of 10 |
| Mixed use | 5 of 10 |
I want to protect my customers and want the real-estate market to develop sustainably.Báo Đầu tư https://www.lavitagarden.com.vn/tin-tuc/tat-ca/Chu-tich-Tong-giam-doc-Hung-Thinh-Corp-Nguyen-Dinh-Trung-Thanh-cong-khong-nho-may-man.html
We only need to sell what the market needs.Nhịp cầu Đầu tư, reproduced by Bat Dong San Hung Thinh 2014https://batdongsanhungthinh.com.vn/nhung-chiec-chia-khoa-vang-cua-doanh-nhan-nguyen-dinh-trung/
Trình độ chuyên môn: Cử nhân chuyên ngành Kế toán
MR. NGUYEN DINH TRUNG Chairman of Board of Directors General Director
Từ 2015 đến nay: Chủ tịch HĐQT Công ty CP Hưng Thịnh Incons.
Từ 2018 đến nay: Chủ tịch HĐQT Công ty CP Hưng Thịnh Land.
Từ 2002 đến 2006: Giám đốc – Công ty CP DV – TM Đồng Tiến (nay là Công ty CP Hưng Thịnh Land).
“I want to protect my customers and want the real-estate market to develop sustainably.”
“We only need to sell what the market needs”
MR. NGUYEN DINH TRUNG Chairman of Board of Directors General Director
Từ 2007 đến nay: Chủ tịch HĐQT kiêm Tổng Giám đốc – Công ty Cổ phần Tập đoàn Hưng Thịnh.
Năm 2002, ông cùng một số người bạn thành lập Công ty Hưng Thịnh.
Trình độ chuyên môn: Cử nhân chuyên ngành Kế toán
MR. NGUYEN DINH TRUNG Chairman of Board of Directors General Director
MR. NGUYEN VAN CUONG Vice Chairman Board of Directors Deputy General Director
Từ 2015: Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị, Công ty Cổ phần Hải Nhân.
Từ 2016: Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị, Công ty Cổ phần Cơ khí và Xây dựng Bình Triệu.
Từ 08/2017: Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị, Công ty Cổ phần Hưng Thịnh Incons.
2002 – 2007: Phó Giám đốc, Công ty Trách nhiệm hữu hạn Đầu tư Đồng Tiến.
MR. NGUYEN VAN CUONG Vice Chairman Board of Directors Deputy General Director
MR. NGUYEN VAN CUONG Vice Chairman Board of Directors Deputy General Director
MR. NGUYEN VAN CUONG Vice Chairman Board of Directors Deputy General Director
MR. NGUYEN VAN CUONG Vice Chairman Board of Directors Deputy General Director
This is an unprecedentedly challenging period for the real-estate industry.Hung Thinh Corporation 2023https://hungthinhcorp.com.vn/tin-tuc/detail/HDQT-Hung-Thinh-Incons-bo-nhiem-Tong-giam-doc-moi.html
Trình độ chuyên môn: Cử nhân Toán tin
MR. TRUONG VAN VIET Vice Chairman Board of Directors Deputy General Director
Từ 6/2020 – nay: Phó Chủ tịch HĐQT – CTCP Hưng Thịnh Incons.
“Đây là giai đoạn thách thức chưa từng có tiền lệ với ngành bất động sản...”, ông Trương Văn Việt chia sẻ.
Từ 2007 – 2019: Phó Tổng Giám đốc – CTCP Tập đoàn Hưng Thịnh. Từ 2020 – nay: Phó Chủ tịch kiêm Phó Tổng Giám đốc – CTCP Tập đoàn Hưng Thịnh.
ông Trương Văn Việt có hơn 16 năm kinh nghiệm quản trị điều hành tại những vị trí lãnh đạo chủ chốt: Phó Tổng Giám đốc, Phó Chủ tịch Tập đoàn Hưng Thịnh, Trưởng Ban Quản lý những dự án trọng điểm của Tập đoàn.
ông Trương Văn Việt có hơn 16 năm kinh nghiệm quản trị điều hành tại những vị trí lãnh đạo chủ chốt: Phó Tổng Giám đốc, Phó Chủ tịch Tập đoàn Hưng Thịnh, Trưởng Ban Quản lý những dự án trọng điểm của Tập đoàn.
MR. TRUONG VAN VIET Vice Chairman Board of Directors Deputy General Director
MR. NGUYEN NGOC HUYEN Deputy General Director
Ông Nguyễn Ngọc Huyên - Phó Tổng Giám đốc Tập đoàn Hưng Thịnh
MR. NGUYEN NGOC HUYEN Deputy General Director
MR. NGUYEN NGOC HUYEN Deputy General Director
MR. HUYNH MINH DUC Member Board of Directors Deputy General Director
Ngày 7/10/2024, Tập đoàn Hưng Thịnh tổ chức công bố và trao quyết định bổ nhiệm Phó Tổng Giám đốc
HĐQT Công ty quyết nghị bổ nhiệm ông Huỳnh Minh Đức giữ chức vụ Phó Tổng Giám đốc Tập đoàn
MR. HUYNH MINH DUC Member Board of Directors Deputy General Director
MR. HUYNH MINH DUC Member Board of Directors Deputy General Director
MR. TRAN QUOC DUNG Member Board of Directors Deputy General Director
bổ nhiệm ông Trần Tiến Thanh, ông Trần Quốc Dũng và ông Thiệu Lê Bình đảm nhiệm chức vụ Phó Tổng Giám đốc Công ty
MR. TRAN QUOC DUNG Member Board of Directors Deputy General Director
0 undated completions and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.
| Project | Location | Type | Units | Floors | Area | Cost | Payment plan | Launched | Construction start | Original target | Handover | Delay | Confidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q7 Saigon Riverside Complex — residential tower cluster (U, M, S, V) | TP. Hồ Chí Minh Quận 7 | residential for sale | 3,5801 | 34, 01 hầm | — | — | 15.0% / 4.5% / 4.0% / 5.0%1 | 2018 | May 06th, 2018 | Jan 2020 – Dec 2020 | Jan 2022 – Dec 2022 | +24.0 mo (+13.0 to +35.0) | sourced | completed |
| Q7 Boulevard | TP.HCM Quận 7 | residential for sale, office, retail, mixed use | 1,0081 | 23 | — | — | 35% (Đợt 1), 3.5% (Đợt 2–13), 3.0% (Đợt 14–19), 5% (Đợt 20)1 | 2019 | 31/7/2019 | Feb 2021 | Jun 2021 | +4.0 mo (+4.0 to +4.0) | estimated | completed |
| Cam Ranh Mystery Villas | not published Cam Lam District | residential for sale | 2411 | 02 | — | — | Thanh toán đợt đầu 38%; các đợt thanh toán sau, mỗi đợt 6%1 | 2017 | April 30, 2017 | Jan 2019 – Dec 2019 | Jan 2021 – Dec 2021 | +24.0 mo (+13.0 to +35.0) | sourced | completed |
| Lavita Charm | TP.HCM | residential for sale, office, retail, mixed use | 9391 | 21, 01 hầm | — | — | 18 đợt thanh toán dài hạn và không lãi suất1 | 2017 | 07/8/2017 | Feb 2021 | Jan 2021 – Dec 2021 | +4.5 mo (−1.0 to +10.0) | sourced | completed |
| Richmond City | TP. HCM Bình Thạnh | residential for sale, office, retail, mixed use | 8801 | 25 | — | — | 15%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 8%, 8%, 9%, 5%1 | 2017 | 02/4/2017 | Jan 2020 | Dec 2020 | +11.0 mo (+11.0 to +11.0) | estimated | completed |
| Moonlight Boulevard | HCMC Binh Tan District | residential for sale, office, retail | 6561 | 20 | — | — | — | 2017 | March 19, 2017 | Feb 2019 | Jan 2020 | +11.0 mo (+11.0 to +11.0) | sourced | completed |
| SaigonMia | TP.HCM Quận 7 | residential for sale, office, retail, mixed use | 8691 | 27 nổi, 02 hầm | — | — | 20% đặt cọc; 4,5% mỗi đợt từ đợt 2 đến đợt 17 theo tiến độ xây dựng; 6% khi thông báo bàn giao căn hộ; 2% khi nhận thông báo bàn giao giấy chứng nhận sở hữu nhà ở1 | 2016 | 12/05/2016 | Aug 2019 | Aug 2019 | dates under review | dates under review | completed |
| Moonlight Residences | TP.HCM Quận Thủ Đức | residential for sale, retail, mixed use | 5351 | 22 nổi, 02 hầm | — | — | — | 2016 | 11.9.2016 | Jul 2019 | Jul 2019 | dates under review | dates under review | completed |
| 9View Apartment | Ho Chi Minh City District 9 | residential for sale | 6901 | 18 | — | — | 10%-12% on contract signing; subsequent installments of 5% each until handover1 | 2016 | 20/3/2016 | May 2019 | May 2019 | dates under review | dates under review | completed |
| Moonlight Park View | Ho Chi Minh City Bình Tân | residential for sale | 4631 | 19 | — | — | 13,5% / 7% / 7% / 6,5% (Đợt 4–12) / 9% / 5%1 | 2016 | 04/12/2016 | Mar 2018 | Dec 2018 | +9.0 mo (+9.0 to +9.0) | sourced | completed |
| Coverage | active |
| Tracked since | October 11, 2026 |
| Last checked | October 12, 2026 this month |
| Profile last researched | October 12, 2026 |
| Claim |