Most available comments describe the building as quiet, clean and well maintained; one Google review specifically says the walls are thick and the building is “quiet and very clean.” A separate Yelp review surfaced in reporting about the property alleges that a 2019 flood affected almost the entire building and later mold exposure; this is a single serious report, not a published engineering finding.

The positive reviews repeatedly describe staff as responsive and the property as “clean, quiet, and very safe,” with praise for the rooftop, lounge, events and walkability. Negative reviewers say the new management “does not communicate with residents,” describe unresolved security-deposit disputes, and complain about increased rent, utilities and added charges.

no notes returned

Published reviews consistently praise the daily experience: guests described the staff as “exceptional,” rooms as “very clean,” and the shuttle as “easy and reliable.” The main operational reservations were uneven breakfast feedback—one Google reviewer called it “disappointing”—plus unfavorable discussion of parking and bathrooms in Google’s topic summary.

Guest reviews generally describe the rooms as clean, spacious and comfortable, and one reviewer said the hotel had “extra insulation” and was “very quiet.” However, other reviews report “stuffy” air, a shower with “very little pressure,” wet carpet after in-room cleaning, and a room that smelled like “a wet dog”; these are guest observations rather than an engineering inspection.

Daily-life feedback is mostly favorable: guests repeatedly describe the staff as friendly or helpful, the shuttle as convenient, and the breakfast as good; one reviewer called the pool and fire-pit area “clean & relaxing.” Countervailing reports describe carpet cleaning in occupied rooms, a propped-open door and unannounced room entry, while other guests found breakfast crowded or limited and reported an unanswered management complaint.