no notes returned

The building-specific reviews describe the quality and fittings as “above average,” say the amenities are “good and fully sufficient,” and praise “excellent 24/7 service and friendly residents.” Another review highlights the shared garden, EV charging and practical layout; the available building-specific feedback is therefore positive, although the Google aggregate is materially lower at 3.7/5 from 57 reviews.

Published resident feedback includes infrastructure-related complaints: one reviewer says “Sound isolation and air circulation are bad” and reports “Mold and air quality very bad.” Another reports a very loud alarm recurring “3/4 times a week”; these are individual resident reports rather than an engineering assessment or published structural sub-score, so the physical-condition evidence remains limited and partly uncorroborated.

Residents describe “Very Good” facilities, a central location and friendly security, while another says the management team is “unprofessional, unresponsive, and careless.” Pool noise and weak security intervention are also reported, alongside a repeated fire-alarm complaint; the positive and negative evidence is mixed, and some of the strongest negative reports are older than the latest page update.

Published resident feedback includes a report involving “Water leaking repair” and “Cealing repair,” plus a separate complaint alleging “cheap quality of materials.” These are individual reports rather than a published engineering assessment, while the older project review praised the “modern and spacious layout” and said the residence was “very well designed”; no building-specific published structural sub-score was found.

Day-to-day feedback is mixed but the larger Google-linked review set is negative: residents wrote “Network is super bad!” and “Bad maintenance overall and upkeep,” while another said neighbours were “friendly” and the property was pet-friendly. A separate building-page review praised the convenient location, and Property Finder’s resident material describes “excellent 24/7 service and friendly residents,” although Property Finder itself says the building has no formal review yet.

The building-specific review material contains one unverified report of a “major fire in building today” and one report that “the floor of the building literally vibrates” because of nearby construction. No reviewed source published a verified engineering, plumbing, HVAC, electrical, lift, waterproofing or fabric assessment; the Property Finder maintenance score is for the wider JVC community, not this building.

The building-specific reviews describe severe day-to-day disruption: one reviewer said workers continued at 7:00 AM after being asked to stop, another called the noise “a WARZONE,” and a third said there was “literally no way you can sleep here.” Booking.com shows a 1.0/10 stay rating from one guest, with staff, facilities, cleanliness, comfort, value and location each at 2.5/10; these are short-stay observations and should not be treated as a resident aggregate.