Artificial Intelligence
Builders Company
Developers/Portman
P
PortmanAtlanta, United States · founded 1957
PRIVATE

Portman develops and invests in office, hospitality, residential, retail, industrial, and mixed-use real estate. Its projects span the United States and international legacy markets, serving investors, tenants, residents, visitors, communities, and public-sector partners through integrated development and asset-management capabilities worldwide.

Years in business
69
founded 1957
LinkedIn headcount
202
employees, as shown on LinkedIn · size band 201–500
Assets under management
USD 5 billion
as published or estimated
Units delivered
10,000
as the company states it
Projects last researched October 11, 2026
Every figure on this card was read out of a document.

Overview

Investor tear sheet

a summary of the tabs that follow · no rating of our own

Company dossier

Legal name
PORTMAN HOLDINGS, LLC1
Headquarters
303 Peachtree Center Avenue NE Suite 5751, Atlanta1, United States
Founded
19571
Entity type
PRIVATE1
Business model
mixed use1, commercial1
Markets
not published
What they build
Residential, for rent (5 of 10) · Retail (4 of 10) · Mixed use (4 of 10)
Full dossier in About →

Delivery record

4 date-assessed of 10 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 0 undated and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
10
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
+1.3 mo
the middle of 4 scored projects
Average delay
+2.5 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
2.6 yrs
start to completion, over 4 delivered projects
Worst slip
+8.0 mo
Camp Hall Campus 4B · +7.0 to +9.0
3
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
1
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
0
red rows below

Against other developers

4 date-assessed here · 236 developers, 878 date-assessed projects in United States
Median delay
Portman·236 developers in United States
+1.3 mo vs +4.5 mo
this developer 3.2 mo better
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
Portman·236 developers in United States
+2.5 mo vs +7.6 mo
this developer 5.1 mo better
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
Portman·236 developers in United States
75% vs 55%
this developer 20 pts better
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
Portman·236 developers in United States
2.6 yrs vs 2.9 yrs
this developer 0.3 yrs faster
Start to completion, over 4 delivered here and 722 in the market.
Projects and timelines in Track Record →

Resident experience

4 of 10 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
8.7/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 4 of 4 rated buildings
Structure & systems
6.9/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 3 of 4 rated buildings
Management & living
8.0/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 4 of 4 rated buildings

Against other developers

4 rated here · 254 developers, 1316 rated buildings in United States
Overall rating
Portman · 254 other developers in United States
8.7 vs 7.8
this developer 0.9 better
The weighted verdict on each side. From 4 of 4 rated buildings here and 1316 in the market.
Structure & systems
Portman · 254 other developers in United States
6.9 vs 7.0
this developer 0.1 worse
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 3 of 4 rated buildings here and 550 in the market.
Management & living
Portman · 254 other developers in United States
8.0 vs 7.4
this developer 0.6 better
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 4 of 4 rated buildings here and 1268 in the market.
The market here is United States: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.
Ratings by building →

Awards & recognition

  • PROJECT AWARD Winner 2025
    Office Development of the Year · Ten Twenty Spring
    Portman is identified as the developer recipient, with Ten Twenty Spring named Office Development of the Year at the 2025 NAIOP Georgia Awards for Excellence.
  • PROJECT AWARD Winner December 12, 2025
    Project of the Year · Spring Quarter
    The developer reports that its Spring Quarter mixed-use development received CoreNet Atlanta’s Project of the Year recognition for projects in the Georgia market.
  • SAFETY / QUALITY Winner May 7, 2024 (reported); award held March 2024
    Outstanding Achievement Award · Sora
    The developer reports that Sora, its residential tower at Spring Quarter, won an Outstanding Achievement award at the 2024 ACI Georgia Chapter Awards.
  • 4 more in Awards
All awards →

Risks & source coverage

  • DELIVERY DELAY Reported February 27, 2024; status last documented December 3, 2025 Portman Holdings’ Ponce & Ponce redevelopment was reported on February 27, 2024 as on hold indefinitely because market conditions no longer supported new ground-up development; Portman said it had not purchased the relevant properties and was considering short-term leases while waiting for the market to improve. This is a reported project delay, not evidence that Portman Holdings itself defaulted or became insolvent; a December 3, 2025 project listing still described Ponce & Ponce as proposed, so completion by October 11, 2026 is not documented.
  • PROJECT CANCELLED 2018-07-09 (publication; cancellation reported at that time) The Emerson at 2520 Peachtree Road, Atlanta: JPX Works, the Atlanta development firm founded by Jarel Portman, cancelled the 41-unit condominium plan and hired JLL to market the site as a development parcel; no later completion is documented in the retrieved source.
  • PROJECT CANCELLED October 2023 withdrawal; reported 2024-05-15 3800 Wynkoop Street/RiNo RTD parking-lot development, Denver: Portman Holdings retracted its proposal, with RTD materials attributing the withdrawal to unfavorable real-estate financing and infeasibility of financing the planned development.
  • 3 more in Risk & Sources
Record status
active
Company sources
134 source entries across 132 fields
Projects tracked
10 · 10 completed in assessment
All flags and sources →

Track Record

Delivery record

4 date-assessed of 10 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 0 undated and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
10
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
+1.3 mo
the middle of 4 scored projects
Average delay
+2.5 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
2.6 yrs
start to completion, over 4 delivered projects
Worst slip
+8.0 mo
Camp Hall Campus 4B · +7.0 to +9.0
3
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
1
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
0
red rows below

Against other developers

4 date-assessed here · 236 developers, 878 date-assessed projects in United States
Median delay
Portman·236 developers in United States
+1.3 mo vs +4.5 mo
this developer 3.2 mo better
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
Portman·236 developers in United States
+2.5 mo vs +7.6 mo
this developer 5.1 mo better
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
Portman·236 developers in United States
75% vs 55%
this developer 20 pts better
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
Portman·236 developers in United States
2.6 yrs vs 2.9 yrs
this developer 0.3 yrs faster
Start to completion, over 4 delivered here and 722 in the market.
The market here is United States: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because planning regimes and reporting norms move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a size band. Read the two delay figures together. A median close to the market with a much better average means no single disaster; the reverse means one project is carrying the record. Time to deliver runs from the earliest start we hold to the completion itself — a construction start where a source gave one, otherwise a sales launch, otherwise the launch year read as its January. A handover the sources place only inside a year is read as that December, so a duration is the widest the record allows rather than the flattering end of it. Only delivered projects dated at both ends count, so it is taken over fewer projects than the delay figures, and a long build is not a fault: a tower is not a villa run. Sourced figures only, both sides, and values taken from documents held on file are excluded here — a developer who shares their records should not score better than one who does not.

Construction start to handover

10 of 10 projects dated · 9 places
Based on covered projects with documented construction or launch dates and available handover dates. Timelines vary by project and may not represent the developer’s full portfolio.
Construction start, or the launchTarget completion (window)Completion or handover, as reportedCurrently statedLaunch year only, no date publishedEarly or ≤6 mo lateOver 6–12 mo lateOver 12 mo lateStalled
Fairburn, United States
Tallahassee, United States
Summerville, South Carolina, United States
Exton, Pennsylvania, United States
Charlotte, United States
Atlanta, United States
Carneys Point, United States
Ridgeville, United States
Nashville, United States
2022202320242025202620272028todayFAIRBURN, UNITED STATES−9 moestimatedTALLAHASSEE, UNITED STATES−4.5 moestimatedSUMMERVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES+3 moverifiedEXTON, PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES+11 moestimatedCHARLOTTE, UNITED STATES+2 moestimated−0.5 moverifiedATLANTA, UNITED STATEScompleted, no target publishedCARNEYS POINT, UNITED STATES+4 moestimatedRIDGEVILLE, UNITED STATES+8 moverifiedNASHVILLE, UNITED STATES−0.5 moverified
Click a row in the chart to open a project, or a table row below to see its sources. The chart runs wider than the page where the record spans many years — scroll it sideways to follow a project to its handover. Every date we have is drawn. A hollow marker is only a launch year, not a date anyone published. No dates published means we looked and found none; dates not yet checked means we have not looked yet. Handing over is not finished — rows say which. A delay is shown when one source gives the promised date and another gives the real one, however rough: "2019" still counts, and the row shows how wide that is. Projects missing one of the two dates, or with sources that disagree, are left out of the figures. 1 dated statement is held back: a broker listing with no date on it, or a page with no year, cannot fix a date. 2 turned out to be about something else — a phase, a neighbour, the wider masterplan — and are marked off-subject.

Building & Livability Ratings

Resident experience

4 of 10 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
8.7/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 4 of 4 rated buildings
Structure & systems
6.9/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 3 of 4 rated buildings
Management & living
8.0/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 4 of 4 rated buildings

Against other developers

4 rated here · 254 developers, 1316 rated buildings in United States
Overall rating
Portman · 254 other developers in United States
8.7 vs 7.8
this developer 0.9 better
The weighted verdict on each side. From 4 of 4 rated buildings here and 1316 in the market.
Structure & systems
Portman · 254 other developers in United States
6.9 vs 7.0
this developer 0.1 worse
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 3 of 4 rated buildings here and 550 in the market.
Management & living
Portman · 254 other developers in United States
8.0 vs 7.4
this developer 0.6 better
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 4 of 4 rated buildings here and 1268 in the market.
The market here is United States: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.

By building

4 rated · 6 not rated · scale 1–10
ProjectOverallStructure & systemsManagement & living
The HallTallahassee191 units
9.9/ 10
8.2/ 10
Find My Place 5/5 · 5 reviews · findmyplace.co
Find My Place publishes 5/5 from 5 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 8.2.
8.2/ 10
Find My Place 5/5 · 5 reviews · findmyplace.co
Find My Place publishes 5/5 from 5 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 8.2.

Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest published review base at 4.9/5 from 61 reviews, which converts to 9.7/10 and sets the level. The written reviews read were uniformly positive about leasing staff and communication, but they provide little evidence about long-term resident operations or physical systems; therefore structure remains unevidenced and the living adjustment is limited.

+ Responsive leasing staff+ Helpful and knowledgeable staff+ Smooth leasing process+ Professional communication+ Convenient campus-adjacent location

no notes returned

no links returned

The published reviews are strongly positive about day-to-day contact with the leasing team: reviewers describe staff as “extremely responsive,” “professional,” and “always quick to help.” Another review says the leasing process was “fast” and that staff were “genuinely helpful,” although the material read is weighted toward prospective residents’ leasing experience rather than established residents’ long-term operations.

LineaSouth End, Charlotte370 units
8.6/ 10
7.4/ 10
ApartmentRatings 5/5 · 1 review · apartmentratings.com
ApartmentRatings publishes 5/5 from 1 review. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.4.
7.4/ 10
ApartmentRatings 5/5 · 1 review · apartmentratings.com
ApartmentRatings publishes 5/5 from 1 review. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.4.

Bozzuto’s 4.5/5 resident aggregate from 170 reviews is the largest clearly identified resident review base and converts to 8.5/10 under the requested curve. The written reviews reinforce strong staff, amenities and community experience; the isolated serious HVAC complaint does not meet the recurring-theme threshold for a deduction.

+ Fast electrical-issue response+ Responsive maintenance team
− One prolonged air-conditioning failure report
+ Responsive leasing staff+ Friendly concierge+ Strong amenity package+ Welcoming community+ Convenient South End location
− Poor communication in one resident complaint− Premium pricing noted by one resident

The available structural/system feedback is mostly positive: ApartmentRatings publishes a 5/5 maintenance score and a resident says an electrical issue was handled fast. However, one June 2025 resident described having no working air conditioning for 2.5 months and said management could not solve the issue; this is a serious individual report, not a demonstrated recurring pattern.

Daily-life reviews are strongly favorable: residents and prospects repeatedly describe staff as friendly, attentive and professional, while praising the rooftop pool, gym, rock-climbing wall, sound lounge and community atmosphere. The principal negative account says “Management has poor communication and inability to solve any issues with apartment,” although the larger Bozzuto review set includes praise for prompt maintenance and helpful staff.

Vera at Savona Mill — Phase IWest End / FreeMoreWest, Charlotte319 units
8.2/ 10
5.0/ 10
8.2/ 10

Google's 4.6/5 rating from 133 reviews sets the level and converts to 8.9/10 under the supplied curve. The score is pulled down by reported maintenance/service failures and serious individual reports involving a ceiling breach and broken doors, while positive staff, amenity and community commentary limits the reduction. Structure is shown separately at 5.0 because the available physical-condition evidence includes serious failures but no structure-specific aggregate rating.

+ Brand-new building+ Well-maintained facility reported by one reviewer+ No broad structural pattern established
− Ceiling hole− Wasp and bee intrusion− No hot water at move-in− Maintenance delays
+ Friendly staff+ Responsive leasing team+ Gym and pool+ Strong community+ Loft spaces
− Unresponsive management reported− Billing issues− Valet-trash skips− Dirty hallways− Package/mail problems

Most available physical-condition feedback is positive or promotional: one reviewer said the maintenance supervisor keeps the facility “well-maintained, safe, and clean,” and another said requests were completed “quickly and efficiently.” However, a March 2026 Google review reported a ceiling hole containing a wasp nest, while another reported no hot water at move-in; these are serious individual reports rather than a quantified building-wide defect pattern.

Day-to-day reviews are mixed: several residents and prospects praised staff as “friendly,” “professional,” “helpful” and “attentive,” while others reported billing problems, skipped valet-trash service and poor follow-through. Amenities are a clear positive—one reviewer specifically loved the “gym and pool”—but a January 2026 review said package handling left residents in a “game of he said she said.”

StarlingGermantown, Nashville359 units
8.1/ 10
—/ 10
8.1/ 10

Bozzuto’s 4.5/5 from 137 resident ratings sets the level and converts to 8.5/10. Google’s 3.8/5 from 111 reviews is a material dissent, while the written evidence is otherwise strongly positive about staff, location and amenities but includes parking and isolated construction-quality complaints; those factors produce 8.1/10 overall and for living quality.

+ Apartment finishes praised+ Washer/dryer reported working+ Clean amenities
− Construction-quality complaint− Sloppy millwork complaint− Fridge replacement within a year− Gnat problem
+ Walkable location+ Friendly front desk+ Responsive staff+ Clean amenities+ Rooftop amenities and views
− Expensive guest parking− Garage billing complaints− Isolated gnat complaint

Most physical comments are favorable: one verified resident praised the apartment finishes, while another said the washer/dryer “actually WORKS.” A separate review alleged “terrible construction and sloppy millwork,” said nothing felt solid or well done, and reported a refrigerator replacement in less than a year; this is a serious but isolated account rather than a recurring structural finding.

Residents repeatedly praise the walkable Germantown setting, clean amenities and staff: one review says the front desk is “always friendly and helpful,” and another calls the location “unbeatable.” The main operational criticism is parking and garage billing—one resident called guest parking “insane expensive,” while another said management did not help with Metropolis charges.

Only buildings that have reached handover are rated. 6 of 10 projects carry no rating: a building still under construction is never asked about, one that has just been handed over may not have been reached yet, and the rest were asked about and no published resident commentary was found. Structure is fixed at handover and stays the developer's; management and living belongs to whoever runs the building now. The overall verdict weights both rather than averaging them. None of this is checked: a rating is what people published about a building, aggregated — it is not evidence, it cannot move a delay figure, and it is not part of the delivery record above.

About

Company dossier

Legal name
PORTMAN HOLDINGS, LLC
Headquarters
303 Peachtree Center Avenue NE Suite 575, Atlanta, United States
30303
Founded
1957
US
Entity type
PRIVATE
Revenue
USD 46.02 million
Business model
mixed use, commercial

Offices

head office and 2 others
AustinDallas

Sources: office cities

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Contact - Portman

Portman
Austin 1:44PM 1717 W. 6th Street Suite 420 Austin, Texas 78703
value seen: Austin
https://www.portmanholdings.com/contact/

Sources: office cities

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Contact - Portman

Portman
Dallas 1:44PM 3838 Oak Lawn Avenue Suite 1000 - 22 Dallas, Texas 75219
value seen: Dallas
https://www.portmanholdings.com/contact/

Partners

15 partners
Starwood
joint venture

Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Starwood.

Skanska
contractor

Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Skanska.

ECDB
partner

Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with ECDB.

Port Authority of San Diego
government partner

The Port Authority of San Diego collaborated with Portman on Hilton San Diego Bayfront through a public-private partnership.

Phelps Development
joint venture

Phelps Development collaborated with Portman on the Hilton San Diego Bayfront convention center hotel.

Hilton
operator

Hilton collaborated with Portman on the Hilton San Diego Bayfront convention center hotel.

ING Clarion
funder

ING Clarion collaborated with Portman on the Hilton San Diego Bayfront convention center hotel.

AIG
funder

Portman Holdings partnered with AIG to develop Shanghai Centre.

Kajima Corporation
contractor

Portman Holdings partnered with Kajima Corporation to develop Shanghai Centre.

Trammell Crow
joint venture

Portman Holdings developed the Westin Peachtree Plaza in partnership with Trammell Crow.

Ehrenkranz Ehrenkranz & Schultz
partner

Portman Holdings developed the Westin Peachtree Plaza in partnership with Ehrenkranz Ehrenkranz & Schultz.

Marriott family
joint venture

Portman Holdings joined forces with the Marriott family to build a convention-district hotel.

Marriott International
operator

Portman Holdings joined forces with Marriott International to build a convention-district hotel.

Singapore Land
funder

Singapore Land was part of the Asian investor consortium that funded Marina Square.

United Overseas Bank
funder

United Overseas Bank was part of the Asian investor consortium that funded Marina Square.

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Westin Warsaw - Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Starwood, Skanska, and ECDB, strategically positioning it in the city’s central business district.
value seen: Starwood
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-warsaw/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Starwood, Skanska, and ECDB, strategically positioning it in the city’s central business district.
value seen: JV_PARTNER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-warsaw/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Westin Warsaw - Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Starwood, Skanska, and ECDB, strategically positioning it in the city’s central business district.
value seen: Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Starwood.
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-warsaw/
COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Starwood, Skanska, and ECDB, strategically positioning it in the city’s central business district.
value seen: Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Starwood.
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-warsaw/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Westin Warsaw - Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Starwood, Skanska, and ECDB, strategically positioning it in the city’s central business district.
value seen: Skanska
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-warsaw/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
In collaboration with the Port Authority of San Diego, Phelps Development, Hilton, and ING Clarion, Portman Holdings spearheaded the development of this convention center hotel through a public-private partnership.
value seen: CONTRACTOR
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/hyatt-regency-san-francisco/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
In collaboration with the Port Authority of San Diego, Phelps Development, Hilton, and ING Clarion, Portman Holdings spearheaded the development of this convention center hotel through a public-private partnership.
value seen: Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Skanska.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/hyatt-regency-san-francisco/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Westin Peachtree Plaza - Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings developed the Westin Peachtree Plaza in partnership with Trammell Crow and Ehrenkranz Ehrenkranz & Schultz in response to increased demand for hotel rooms in its surrounding convention district.
value seen: Ehrenkranz Ehrenkranz & Schultz
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-peachtree-plaza/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: OTHER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: Portman Holdings developed the Westin Peachtree Plaza in partnership with Ehrenkranz Ehrenkranz & Schultz.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

About - Portman

Portman
In 1985, Portman Holdings joined forces with the Marriott family and Marriott International to build this hotel, meeting the growing need for lodging in the city’s convention district.
value seen: Marriott family
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: JV_PARTNER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: Portman Holdings joined forces with the Marriott family to build a convention-district hotel.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

About - Portman

Portman
In 1985, Portman Holdings joined forces with the Marriott family and Marriott International to build this hotel, meeting the growing need for lodging in the city’s convention district.
value seen: Marriott International
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: OPERATOR
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: Portman Holdings joined forces with Marriott International to build a convention-district hotel.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

About - Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: Singapore Land
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: FUNDER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: Singapore Land was part of the Asian investor consortium that funded Marina Square.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

About - Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: United Overseas Bank
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: FUNDER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: United Overseas Bank was part of the Asian investor consortium that funded Marina Square.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Westin Warsaw - Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with Starwood, Skanska, and ECDB, strategically positioning it in the city’s central business district.
value seen: ECDB
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-warsaw/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings partnered with AIG and Kajima Corporation to develop this project – the first foreign development in China following the country’s market liberalization in the 1980s.
value seen: OTHER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/shanghai-centre/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings partnered with AIG and Kajima Corporation to develop this project – the first foreign development in China following the country’s market liberalization in the 1980s.
value seen: Portman Holdings developed The Westin Warsaw in partnership with ECDB.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/shanghai-centre/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Hilton San Diego Bayfront - Portman

Portman
In collaboration with the Port Authority of San Diego, Phelps Development, Hilton, and ING Clarion, Portman Holdings spearheaded the development of this convention center hotel through a public-private partnership.
value seen: Port Authority of San Diego
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/hyatt-regency-san-francisco/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings developed the Westin Peachtree Plaza in partnership with Trammell Crow and Ehrenkranz Ehrenkranz & Schultz in response to increased demand for hotel rooms in its surrounding convention district.
value seen: GOVERNMENT_PARTNER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-peachtree-plaza/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings developed the Westin Peachtree Plaza in partnership with Trammell Crow and Ehrenkranz Ehrenkranz & Schultz in response to increased demand for hotel rooms in its surrounding convention district.
value seen: The Port Authority of San Diego collaborated with Portman on Hilton San Diego Bayfront through a public-private partnership.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-peachtree-plaza/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Hilton San Diego Bayfront - Portman

Portman
In collaboration with the Port Authority of San Diego, Phelps Development, Hilton, and ING Clarion, Portman Holdings spearheaded the development of this convention center hotel through a public-private partnership.
value seen: Phelps Development
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/hyatt-regency-san-francisco/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
In 1985, Portman Holdings joined forces with the Marriott family and Marriott International to build this hotel, meeting the growing need for lodging in the city’s convention district.
value seen: JV_PARTNER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
In 1985, Portman Holdings joined forces with the Marriott family and Marriott International to build this hotel, meeting the growing need for lodging in the city’s convention district.
value seen: Phelps Development collaborated with Portman on the Hilton San Diego Bayfront convention center hotel.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Hilton San Diego Bayfront - Portman

Portman
In collaboration with the Port Authority of San Diego, Phelps Development, Hilton, and ING Clarion, Portman Holdings spearheaded the development of this convention center hotel through a public-private partnership.
value seen: Hilton
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/hyatt-regency-san-francisco/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
In 1985, Portman Holdings joined forces with the Marriott family and Marriott International to build this hotel, meeting the growing need for lodging in the city’s convention district.
value seen: OPERATOR
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
In 1985, Portman Holdings joined forces with the Marriott family and Marriott International to build this hotel, meeting the growing need for lodging in the city’s convention district.
value seen: Hilton collaborated with Portman on the Hilton San Diego Bayfront convention center hotel.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Hilton San Diego Bayfront - Portman

Portman
In collaboration with the Port Authority of San Diego, Phelps Development, Hilton, and ING Clarion, Portman Holdings spearheaded the development of this convention center hotel through a public-private partnership.
value seen: ING Clarion
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/hyatt-regency-san-francisco/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: FUNDER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: ING Clarion collaborated with Portman on the Hilton San Diego Bayfront convention center hotel.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Shanghai Centre – Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings partnered with AIG and Kajima Corporation to develop this project – the first foreign development in China following the country’s market liberalization in the 1980s.
value seen: AIG
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/shanghai-centre/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: FUNDER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: Portman Holdings partnered with AIG to develop Shanghai Centre.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Shanghai Centre – Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings partnered with AIG and Kajima Corporation to develop this project – the first foreign development in China following the country’s market liberalization in the 1980s.
value seen: Kajima Corporation
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/shanghai-centre/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: CONTRACTOR
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: Portman Holdings partnered with Kajima Corporation to develop Shanghai Centre.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Westin Peachtree Plaza - Portman

Portman
Portman Holdings developed the Westin Peachtree Plaza in partnership with Trammell Crow and Ehrenkranz Ehrenkranz & Schultz in response to increased demand for hotel rooms in its surrounding convention district.
value seen: Trammell Crow
https://www.portmanholdings.com/portfolio/westin-peachtree-plaza/

Sources: partner type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: JV_PARTNER
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Partner project page

Portman
Portman Holdings collaborated with a consortium of Asian investors, including Singapore Land, Shing Kwan Investments, CY Paul, Lim Soe Long, United Overseas Bank, and Overseas Union Bank, to fund this development, which debuted in 1987.
value seen: Portman Holdings developed the Westin Peachtree Plaza in partnership with Trammell Crow.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/about/

Registrations & licences

COMPANY NUMBERM24000001986
Florida Division of Corporations · US · Active
Jurisdiction-agnostic: a DLD number, a Companies House number and a state RERA registration all land in the same table.

Contact

Markets

0 countries

What they build

5 types
Residential, for rent5 of 10
Retail4 of 10
Mixed use4 of 10
Industrial4 of 10
Office1 of 10
A project counts once under each type it carries, so the shares add to more than the project count.

Management

Principals & executives

6 names found
AB
Ambrish Baisiwala
Ambrish Baisiwala oversees Portman’s corporate management and real-estate investment. He became CEO in 2010 and has led the firm’s repositioning toward a broader U.S. investment and development platform after senior international roles.
Current title
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
University of RajasthanBachelor of Commerce (Honors)
Melbourne Business SchoolMBA
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
nothing tagged
https://linkedin.com/in/ambrish-baisiwala-78817211

Sources: degree

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
Bachelor of Commerce (Honors)
value seen: Bachelor of Commerce (Honors)
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/ambrish-baisiwala/

Sources: institution

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Ambrish Baisiwala - Portman

Portman
Ambrish holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Honors) degree from the University of Rajasthan, India
value seen: University of Rajasthan
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/ambrish-baisiwala/

Sources: degree

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
MBA
value seen: MBA
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/ambrish-baisiwala/

Sources: institution

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
Melbourne Business School
value seen: Melbourne Business School
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/ambrish-baisiwala/

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Ambrish Baisiwala - Portman

Portman
Ambrish Baisiwala Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
value seen: Ambrish Baisiwala
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/ambrish-baisiwala/

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIAL2026-10-06

Ambrish Baisiwala

LinkedIn
Chairman & CEO - PORTMAN
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/ambrish-baisiwala-78817211
https://linkedin.com/in/ambrish-baisiwala-78817211

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Ambrish Baisiwala - Portman

Portman
Since becoming CEO in 2010, Ambrish has strategically repositioned the firm to focus on the U.S. domestic market.
value seen: Ambrish Baisiwala oversees Portman’s corporate management and real-estate investment. He became CEO in 2010 and has led the firm’s repositioning toward a broader U.S. investment and development platform after senior international roles.
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/ambrish-baisiwala/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Ambrish Baisiwala - Portman

Portman
Ambrish Baisiwala Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
value seen: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/ambrish-baisiwala/
JC
John C. Portman IV
John C. Portman IV shares responsibility for Portman Holdings’ general management and strategic direction, with a focus on pre-development and U.S. capital markets. His background includes KPMG corporate finance, Goldman Sachs real-estate investing and Whole Foods analyst work.
Current title
President
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
Harvard CollegeBachelor’s degree, cum laude
Cardiff UniversityMaster’s degree
Goizueta Business School, Emory UniversityMBA, Finance
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
nothing tagged

Sources: degree

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
Bachelor’s degree, cum laude
value seen: Bachelor’s degree, cum laude
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/john-portman-iv/

Sources: institution

COMPANYdate not shown in source

John C. Portman IV – Portman

Portman
He graduated cum laude from Harvard College
value seen: Harvard College
Harvard College

Sources: degree

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
Master’s degree
value seen: Master’s degree
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/john-portman-iv/

Sources: institution

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
Cardiff University
value seen: Cardiff University
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/john-portman-iv/

Sources: degree

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
MBA, Finance
value seen: MBA, Finance
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/john-portman-iv/

Sources: institution

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
Goizueta Business School, Emory University
value seen: Goizueta Business School, Emory University
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/john-portman-iv/

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

John C. Portman IV – Portman

Portman
John C. Portman IV President
value seen: John C. Portman IV
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/john-portman-iv/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

John C. Portman IV – Portman

Portman
John shares responsibility for the general management and strategic direction of Portman Holdings.
value seen: John C. Portman IV shares responsibility for Portman Holdings’ general management and strategic direction, with a focus on pre-development and U.S. capital markets. His background includes KPMG corporate finance, Goldman Sachs real-estate investing and Whole Foods analyst work.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/john-portman-iv/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

John C. Portman IV – Portman

Portman
John C. Portman IV President
value seen: President
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/john-portman-iv/
JP
Jana Portman Simmons
Jana Portman Simmons leads Portman Financial and serves on Portman-related and community boards. Her earlier career covered Macy’s buying, boutique ownership and California Gift Show buyer relations before she joined Portman Financial in 2013.
Current title
President, Portman Financial
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
Sweet Briar CollegeB.A. in religion (1982)
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
nothing tagged
https://linkedin.com/in/jana-simmons-289bb152

Sources: degree

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
B.A. in religion (1982)
value seen: B.A. in religion (1982)
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/jana-portman-simmons/

Sources: institution

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Jana Portman Simmons – Portman

Portman
She earned a B.A. in religion from Sweet Briar College in 1982
value seen: Sweet Briar College
Sweet Briar College

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Jana Portman Simmons – Portman

Portman
Jana Portman Simmons President, Portman Financial
value seen: Jana Portman Simmons
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/jana-portman-simmons/

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

Jana Portman Simmons – Portman

LinkedIn
https://linkedin.com/in/jana-simmons-289bb152
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/jana-simmons-289bb152
https://linkedin.com/in/jana-simmons-289bb152

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Jana Portman Simmons – Portman

Portman
Jana joined Portman Financial in 2013.
value seen: Jana Portman Simmons leads Portman Financial and serves on Portman-related and community boards. Her earlier career covered Macy’s buying, boutique ownership and California Gift Show buyer relations before she joined Portman Financial in 2013.
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/jana-portman-simmons/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Jana Portman Simmons – Portman

Portman
Jana Portman Simmons President, Portman Financial
value seen: President, Portman Financial
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/jana-portman-simmons/
TG
Travis Garland
Travis Garland oversees day-to-day business across Portman’s asset classes, shaping strategy, executing transactions and driving development. Previously Managing Director of Office, he led transactions totaling more than $4 billion in gross value and has been recognized repeatedly by NAIOP, Real Estate Forum and CoStar.
Current title
Chief Development Officer
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
University of GeorgiaB.B.A. in real estate
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
nothing tagged
http://www.linkedin.com/in/travis-garland-14b486b

Sources: degree

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
B.B.A. in real estate
value seen: B.B.A. in real estate
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/travis-garland/

Sources: institution

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Travis Garland - Portman

Portman
Travis holds a B.B.A. in real estate from the University of Georgia
value seen: University of Georgia
University of Georgia

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Travis Garland - Portman

Portman
Travis Garland Chief Development Officer
value seen: Travis Garland
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/travis-garland/

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

Travis Garland - Portman

LinkedIn
http://www.linkedin.com/in/travis-garland-14b486b
value seen: http://www.linkedin.com/in/travis-garland-14b486b
http://www.linkedin.com/in/travis-garland-14b486b

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Travis Garland - Portman

Portman
As Chief Development Officer, Travis Garland oversees the day-to-day business across all asset classes at Portman
value seen: Travis Garland oversees day-to-day business across Portman’s asset classes, shaping strategy, executing transactions and driving development. Previously Managing Director of Office, he led transactions totaling more than $4 billion in gross value and has been recognized repeatedly by NAIOP, Real Estate Forum and CoStar.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/travis-garland/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Travis Garland - Portman

Portman
Travis Garland Chief Development Officer
value seen: Chief Development Officer
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/travis-garland/
AK
Andy Kroll
Andy Kroll runs Portman’s operating platform and previously headed asset management for the company. His nearly three decades in commercial real estate include senior COO roles at SunTrust Bank’s commercial-real-estate business and Trimont.
Current title
Chief Operating Officer
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
Georgia TechBachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering
University of GeorgiaMBA
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
nothing tagged

Sources: degree

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering
value seen: Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/andy-kroll/

Sources: institution

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Andy Kroll - Portman

Portman
Andy received his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech
value seen: Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech

Sources: degree

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
MBA
value seen: MBA
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/andy-kroll/

Sources: institution

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Portman biography

Portman
University of Georgia
value seen: University of Georgia
value paraphrased from this source
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/andy-kroll/

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Andy Kroll - Portman

Portman
Andy Kroll Chief Operating Officer
value seen: Andy Kroll
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/andy-kroll/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Andy Kroll - Portman

Portman
Andy Kroll brings almost three decades of commercial real estate experience to his role as Chief Operating Officer of Portman
value seen: Andy Kroll runs Portman’s operating platform and previously headed asset management for the company. His nearly three decades in commercial real estate include senior COO roles at SunTrust Bank’s commercial-real-estate business and Trimont.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/andy-kroll/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Andy Kroll - Portman

Portman
Andy Kroll Chief Operating Officer
value seen: Chief Operating Officer
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/andy-kroll/
SS
Steve Stavich
Steve Stavich leads Portman’s tax-compliance and consulting work, including structuring, due diligence and REIT testing. He also holds board and secretary roles across Portman entities; before joining, he worked in real-estate tax at a Big Four accounting firm and in legal research.
Current title
Executive Vice President, Portman Financial
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
not published
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
nothing tagged

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Steve Stavich - Portman

Portman
Steve Stavich Executive Vice President, Portman Financial
value seen: Steve Stavich
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/steve-stavich/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Steve Stavich - Portman

Portman
As Executive Vice President of Portman Financial, LLC, Steve works with the Portman Companies and leads tax compliance and consulting efforts.
value seen: Steve Stavich leads Portman’s tax-compliance and consulting work, including structuring, due diligence and REIT testing. He also holds board and secretary roles across Portman entities; before joining, he worked in real-estate tax at a Big Four accounting firm and in legal research.
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/steve-stavich/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Steve Stavich - Portman

Portman
Steve Stavich Executive Vice President, Portman Financial
value seen: Executive Vice President, Portman Financial
https://www.portmanholdings.com/people/steve-stavich/

Projects

Assessment coverage

Completed projects: 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15. Initial research is capped at 10 completed projects and a separate delivery-risk search capped at 7 findings. Risk findings are not project assessment counts. Absence is not proof of a complete portfolio or no failures. Month-level dates overlapping a boundary are excluded from figures.

0 undated completions and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.

Stalled, cancelled & overdue projects

0 evidenced cases
The capped delivery-risk search ran; no project-level exception cases are recorded here. Risk findings are listed under Risks and are separate from assessed projects. This does not establish that the developer has no delivery failures.

Completed projects

10 projects
ProjectLocationTypeUnitsFloorsAreaCostPayment planLaunchedConstruction startOriginal targetHandoverDelayConfidenceStatus
Meadow Glen VillageFairburn, United States
residential for rent, retail, mixed use3321——USD 46.6m
construction loan
—202524th July 2025Jun 2027Sep 2026−9.0 mo
(−9.0 to −9.0)
estimatedcompleted
The HallTallahassee, United States
residential for rent, retail1911——USD 73.3m
construction loan
—2024August 30, 2024Jan 2026 – Dec 2027Aug 2026−4.5 mo
(−16.0 to +7.0)
estimatedcompleted
Summerville Logistics CenterSummerville, South Carolina, United States
Dorchester County
industrial—two single-storey buildings545,240 sq ft——202326th July 2023Oct 2025 – Dec 2025Feb 2026+3.0 mo
(+2.0 to +4.0)
sourcedcompleted
I-76 Trade Center – Phase IExton, Pennsylvania, United States
industrial——636,130 sq ftUSD 330m
estimated cost
—20232023Jun 2024 – Aug 2024Jun 2025+11.0 mo
(+10.0 to +12.0)
estimatedcompleted
LineaCharlotte, United States
South End
residential for rent, retail, mixed use370124 stories———202209th September 2022Feb 2025Apr 2025+2.0 mo
(+2.0 to +2.0)
estimatedcompleted
Ten Twenty SpringAtlanta, United States
Midtown
office——530,000 sq ft——2022April 2022—Dec 2024—not scorablecompleted
Carney Commerce CenterCarneys Point, United States
industrial——587,500 sq ft——2023April 20, 2023Jan 2024 – Mar 2024Jun 2024+4.0 mo
(+3.0 to +5.0)
estimatedcompleted
Camp Hall Campus 4BRidgeville, United States
Camp Hall Commerce Park / Campus 4
industrial——1,123,360 sq ft——2022October 3, 2022Jun 2023 – Aug 2023Mar 2024+8.0 mo
(+7.0 to +9.0)
sourcedcompleted
StarlingNashville, United States
Germantown
residential for rent, retail, mixed use35917 stories + loft/mezzanine level578,747 sq ft——2022March of 2022Jun 2024 – Aug 2024Jan 2024 – Dec 2024−0.5 mo
(−7.0 to +6.0)
sourcedcompleted
Vera at Savona Mill — Phase ICharlotte, United States
West End / FreeMoreWest
residential for rent, mixed use3191—406,000 sq ft——20222022Jul 2024Jan 2024 – Dec 2024−0.5 mo
(−6.0 to +5.0)
sourcedcompleted
Click any row for the sources behind it. Cost basis matters: an estimated cost, a construction loan and a sale price are different numbers. Each row states which one it is, so they are never averaged together.

Awards

Awards & recognition

7 found
PROJECT AWARD Winner 2025
Office Development of the Year · Ten Twenty Spring
Portman is identified as the developer recipient, with Ten Twenty Spring named Office Development of the Year at the 2025 NAIOP Georgia Awards for Excellence.
PROJECT AWARD Winner December 12, 2025
Project of the Year · Spring Quarter
The developer reports that its Spring Quarter mixed-use development received CoreNet Atlanta’s Project of the Year recognition for projects in the Georgia market.
SAFETY / QUALITY Winner May 7, 2024 (reported); award held March 2024
Outstanding Achievement Award · Sora
The developer reports that Sora, its residential tower at Spring Quarter, won an Outstanding Achievement award at the 2024 ACI Georgia Chapter Awards.
PROJECT AWARD Winner March 28, 2024 (reported)
Best in Real Estate Award · I-76 Trade Center
The developer reports receiving a Best in Real Estate Award for its purchase of 169 acres in Exton to develop I-76 Trade Center.
SUSTAINABILITY Certified 2022 source page; certification described as achieved by then
LEED Platinum certification · Coda Tech Square
ULI Atlanta identifies Portman Holdings on the project team and states that Coda Tech Square was the first multi-tenant building in Georgia to achieve LEED Platinum certification.
PROJECT AWARD Winner May 19, 2022
Awards for Excellence — Office/Commercial Mixed Use · Coda Tech Square
ULI Atlanta lists 725 Ponce Coda Tech Square as the winner in its Office/Commercial Mixed Use category and names Portman Holdings on the project team.
PROJECT AWARD Winner March 8, 2020 (reported)
Design of the Year · Coda at Tech Square
Atlanta Business Journal reporting states that Portman Holdings’ Coda earned Design of the Year honors in the 2020 Best in Atlanta Real Estate Awards.

Risks

Risk flags

6 found
DELIVERY DELAY Reported February 27, 2024; status last documented December 3, 2025
Portman Holdings’ Ponce & Ponce redevelopment was reported on February 27, 2024 as on hold indefinitely because market conditions no longer supported new ground-up development; Portman said it had not purchased the relevant properties and was considering short-term leases while waiting for the market to improve. This is a reported project delay, not evidence that Portman Holdings itself defaulted or became insolvent; a December 3, 2025 project listing still described Ponce & Ponce as proposed, so completion by October 11, 2026 is not documented.
PROJECT CANCELLED 2018-07-09 (publication; cancellation reported at that time)
The Emerson at 2520 Peachtree Road, Atlanta: JPX Works, the Atlanta development firm founded by Jarel Portman, cancelled the 41-unit condominium plan and hired JLL to market the site as a development parcel; no later completion is documented in the retrieved source.
PROJECT CANCELLED October 2023 withdrawal; reported 2024-05-15
3800 Wynkoop Street/RiNo RTD parking-lot development, Denver: Portman Holdings retracted its proposal, with RTD materials attributing the withdrawal to unfavorable real-estate financing and infeasibility of financing the planned development.
PROJECT CANCELLED 2022-11-17 (publication; withdrawal occurred before that report)
Hudson Intel warehouse, Hudson, Massachusetts: Portman Industrial, a division of Portman Holdings, withdrew its 1.2-million-square-foot warehouse application; the planning board accepted the withdrawal, while noting the application could technically be resubmitted and a local official considered that unlikely.
PROJECT CANCELLED 2016-03-15 event; reported 2016-03-24 (older unresolved material failure)
Miami Beach Convention Center Hotel: Portman Holdings’ proposed hotel could not proceed after voters rejected the required public-land lease referendum, which received 54% support against the 60% threshold; Portman vice-chairman Jack Portman acknowledged the proposal fell short.
DELIVERY DELAY 2023-08-25/29 reports; status subsequently described as Portman backing away in August 2026
Ponce & Ponce, Virginia-Highland Atlanta: Portman Holdings scaled back the multi-block redevelopment, dropped three parcels because of financing and construction-cost conditions, and said construction was not expected to start for at least two years; later 2026 reporting says Portman ultimately backed away, so this is not presented as an active delayed build.

Record status

active
Coverageactive
Tracked sinceOctober 10, 2026
Last checkedOctober 11, 2026 this month
Profile last researchedOctober 11, 2026
Claim
Work for this company? Claiming lets you correct the record with sources and get alerts when it changes.
For informational purposes only. This information is not investment, financial or credit advice and should not be relied on for investment, lending or credit decisions. Records may be incomplete or outdated. Verify information independently and seek qualified advice before making a decision.