Artificial Intelligence
Builders Company
R
RXRNew York, United States · founded 2007 · 1 active markets
PRIVATE

RXR develops, invests in, operates, and manages office, multifamily, logistics, industrial, infrastructure, and mixed-use properties across the United States, serving residents, tenants, investors, public agencies, and communities through vertically integrated development, asset management, construction, leasing, financing, partnerships, and services.

Years in business
19
founded 2007
Employees
~420
company-stated employees · 2024 calendar year · size band 501–1,000
LinkedIn headcount
501-1000
employees, as shown on LinkedIn
Assets under management
USD 19.1 billion
9/30/25
Units delivered
over 5,963 multifamily units from 2020 to 2024
as the company states it
Projects last researched October 15, 2026
Every figure on this card was read out of a document.

Overview

Investor tear sheet

a summary of the tabs that follow · no rating of our own

Company dossier

Legal name
RXR Realty LLC1
Headquarters
75 Rockefeller Plaza1, New York1, United States
Founded
20071
Entity type
PRIVATE1
Business model
offplan for sale1, build to sell institutional1, commercial1, mixed use1, masterplan1, contracting1, other1
Markets
1 market listed
What they build
Residential, for rent (7 of 10) · Mixed use (3 of 10) · Retail (3 of 10)
Full dossier in About →

Delivery record

6 date-assessed of 10 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 0 undated and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
10
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
+8.8 mo
the middle of 6 scored projects
Average delay
+13.3 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
3.6 yrs
start to completion, over 6 delivered projects
Worst slip
+52.0 mo
Pier 57 · +45.0 to +59.0
2
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
2
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
2
red rows below

Against other developers

6 date-assessed here · 242 developers, 903 date-assessed projects in United States
Median delay
RXR·242 developers in United States
+8.8 mo vs +4.5 mo
this developer 4.3 mo worse
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
RXR·242 developers in United States
+13.3 mo vs +7.5 mo
this developer 5.8 mo worse
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
RXR·242 developers in United States
33% vs 55%
this developer 22 pts worse
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
RXR·242 developers in United States
3.6 yrs vs 2.9 yrs
this developer 0.7 yrs slower
Start to completion, over 6 delivered here and 743 in the market.
Projects and timelines in Track Record →

Resident experience

9 of 10 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
8.2/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 9 of 9 rated buildings
Structure & systems
7.0/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 4 of 9 rated buildings
Management & living
7.8/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 9 of 9 rated buildings

Against other developers

9 rated here · 261 developers, 1346 rated buildings in United States
Overall rating
RXR · 261 other developers in United States
8.2 vs 7.8
this developer 0.4 better
The weighted verdict on each side. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 1346 in the market.
Structure & systems
RXR · 261 other developers in United States
7.0 vs 6.9
this developer 0.1 better
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 4 of 9 rated buildings here and 568 in the market.
Management & living
RXR · 261 other developers in United States
7.8 vs 7.4
this developer 0.4 better
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 1295 in the market.
The market here is United States: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.
Ratings by building →

Awards & recognition

All awards →

Risks & source coverage

  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS Default reported May 20, 2024; auction and loss of control reported March 17, 2025. RXR and partners defaulted on the $315 million mortgage secured by 340 Madison Avenue after failing to pay at maturity and after an extension; MassMutual sought foreclosure, and Barings later bought the property at auction for $161 million, causing RXR to lose control of the building.
  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS Default/maturity December 8, 2023; foreclosure reported December 4, 2024; vacancy update reported July 8, 2025. The $670 million loan secured by RXR’s Helmsley Building reached maturity on December 8, 2023, was transferred to special servicing, and lenders filed a foreclosure action after a forbearance expired; RXR said it remained in constructive discussions with lenders, while later reporting said vacancy rose to 44%.
  • PROJECT CANCELLED March 5, 2025. Riverhead’s Town Board rescinded the resolutions naming RXR and Georgica Green Ventures joint master developers for the railroad-station-area redevelopment after the proposed master-developer agreement was never fully executed; officials said the town needed a clean slate and reported no movement from RXR.
  • 7 more in Risk & Sources
Record status
active
Company sources
73 source entries across 72 fields
Projects tracked
10 · 10 completed in assessment
All flags and sources →

Track Record

Delivery record

6 date-assessed of 10 projects
Unverified by developer

AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.

Completed projects from 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15, with sufficient delivery-date evidence. Date assessment and developer profile verification do not mean an independent audit of every source. Original source links and available snippets are provided. May not represent the developer’s full portfolio. 0 undated and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are excluded. Delivery exceptions are listed separately under Projects.
Completed projects assessed
10
within the rolling ten-year window
Median delay
+8.8 mo
the middle of 6 scored projects
Average delay
+13.3 mo
the same projects, pulled by the worst
Average time to deliver
3.6 yrs
start to completion, over 6 delivered projects
Worst slip
+52.0 mo
Pier 57 · +45.0 to +59.0
2
early or less than 6 months late
6 to 12 months late
2
yellow rows below
Over 12 months late
2
red rows below

Against other developers

6 date-assessed here · 242 developers, 903 date-assessed projects in United States
Median delay
RXR·242 developers in United States
+8.8 mo vs +4.5 mo
this developer 4.3 mo worse
The typical project on each side.
Average delay
RXR·242 developers in United States
+13.3 mo vs +7.5 mo
this developer 5.8 mo worse
Both pulled by their worst few.
On time
RXR·242 developers in United States
33% vs 55%
this developer 22 pts worse
Share of date-assessed projects delivered early or less than 6 months after the original target. Exactly 6 months late is excluded.
Average time to deliver
RXR·242 developers in United States
3.6 yrs vs 2.9 yrs
this developer 0.7 yrs slower
Start to completion, over 6 delivered here and 743 in the market.
The market here is United States: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because planning regimes and reporting norms move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a size band. Read the two delay figures together. A median close to the market with a much better average means no single disaster; the reverse means one project is carrying the record. Time to deliver runs from the earliest start we hold to the completion itself — a construction start where a source gave one, otherwise a sales launch, otherwise the launch year read as its January. A handover the sources place only inside a year is read as that December, so a duration is the widest the record allows rather than the flattering end of it. Only delivered projects dated at both ends count, so it is taken over fewer projects than the delay figures, and a long build is not a fault: a tower is not a villa run. Sourced figures only, both sides, and values taken from documents held on file are excluded here — a developer who shares their records should not score better than one who does not.

Construction start to handover

10 of 10 projects dated · 6 places
Based on covered projects with documented construction or launch dates and available handover dates. Timelines vary by project and may not represent the developer’s full portfolio.
Construction start, or the launchTarget completion (window)Completion or handover, as reportedCurrently statedLaunch year only, no date publishedEarly or ≤6 mo lateOver 6–12 mo lateOver 12 mo lateStalled
Brooklyn, United States
New York, United States
White Plains, United States
New Rochelle, United States
Bronx, United States
Yonkers, United States
201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027todayBROOKLYN, UNITED STATES+12.5 moestimatedNEW YORK, UNITED STATES+7 moestimated−5.5 moverified+52 moverifiedWHITE PLAINS, UNITED STATES+8.5 moverified−3.5 moverifiedNEW ROCHELLE, UNITED STATES+9 moverifiedcompleted, no target publishedBRONX, UNITED STATES+3.5 moestimatedYONKERS, UNITED STATES+19.5 moverified
Click a row in the chart to open a project, or a table row below to see its sources. The chart runs wider than the page where the record spans many years — scroll it sideways to follow a project to its handover. Every date we have is drawn. A hollow marker is only a launch year, not a date anyone published. No dates published means we looked and found none; dates not yet checked means we have not looked yet. Handing over is not finished — rows say which. A delay is shown when one source gives the promised date and another gives the real one, however rough: "2019" still counts, and the row shows how wide that is. Projects missing one of the two dates, or with sources that disagree, are left out of the figures. 1 dated statement is held back: a broker listing with no date on it, or a page with no year, cannot fix a date. 3 turned out to be about something else — a phase, a neighbour, the wider masterplan — and are marked off-subject.

Building & Livability Ratings

Resident experience

9 of 10 buildings rated · scale 1–10

AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.

Overall verdict
8.2/ 10
Weighted judgment across build and operations · from 9 of 9 rated buildings
Structure & systems
7.0/ 10
Fabric, services, waterproofing, envelope · from 4 of 9 rated buildings
Management & living
7.8/ 10
Upkeep, response times, amenities, community · from 9 of 9 rated buildings

Against other developers

9 rated here · 261 developers, 1346 rated buildings in United States
Overall rating
RXR · 261 other developers in United States
8.2 vs 7.8
this developer 0.4 better
The weighted verdict on each side. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 1346 in the market.
Structure & systems
RXR · 261 other developers in United States
7.0 vs 6.9
this developer 0.1 better
Fabric and engineering only — fixed at handover. From 4 of 9 rated buildings here and 568 in the market.
Management & living
RXR · 261 other developers in United States
7.8 vs 7.4
this developer 0.4 better
Upkeep and response — belongs to whoever runs the building now. From 9 of 9 rated buildings here and 1295 in the market.
The market here is United States: every other developer whose head office is in the same country, because the review platforms residents use, and the service norms they judge against, move together within one. It is not a city, a sector or a price band. Read structure and living together. A developer above the market on structure and below it on living builds well and runs buildings badly, which is a fixable problem and a different one from building badly. Higher ratings are better; differences use the displayed scores rounded to one decimal. Rated buildings only, on both sides, and a structure or living score with no stated basis — no review count and no notes or links — is left out of both.

By building

9 rated · 1 not rated · scale 1–10
ProjectOverallStructure & systemsManagement & living
25 Cottage at AVE Hamilton GreenWhite Plains170 units
9.7/ 10
—/ 10
9.7/ 10

The largest published review base located for this specific address is the reported Google aggregate of 4.9/5 from 26 reviewers, which converts to 9.7/10 on the specified curve. The only directly read resident review was positive overall but also noted parking-gate failures and a dusty garage; with only one such review, those issues are reported but do not qualify as recurring-theme deductions.

− Dusty parking garage
+ Friendly staff+ Respectful staff+ Strong amenities+ Positive resident experience
− Parking gates sometimes fail− Dusty garage

The only directly read resident review did not report a structural, plumbing, HVAC, electrical, leak, or waterproofing failure. It did report that “the garage is super dusty,” requiring the resident to wash the car after leaving it there for a week; this is an upkeep observation rather than evidence of a building-systems defect.

The one resident review described the property as a “very nice place,” said that “everyone I've met in the building has been great,” and called the employees “super friendly and respectful.” The same review’s operational complaints were that “the gates sometimes don't work” and “the garage is super dusty”; no recurring themes can be established from one review.

Pier 57New York
9.4/ 10
—/ 10
8.6/ 10
Google Reviews/Maps 4.8/5 · 673 reviews · exa.ai
Google Reviews/Maps publishes 4.8/5 from 673 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 8.6.

The largest review base is Google’s 4.8/5 rating for Pier 57 Rooftop Park from 673 reviews, which converts to 9.4/10 under the requested curve. The written feedback is strongly positive about views, calmness and amenities, but it is visitor evidence rather than evidence from residential tenants; no recurring qualifying negative theme was reported.

+ Scenic views+ Peaceful rooftop+ Spacious public areas+ Food hall and eateries+ Effective visitor security
− Restricted access to event areas− High food and drink prices

no notes returned

no links returned

Published Google reviews describe Pier 57 as “a vibrant waterfront destination” with “stunning skyline views,” a rooftop park, food hall and cultural spaces. Visitors also report that the rooftop can be “peaceful” and “not crowded,” while one review says security will “kick you out” of restricted event areas and another says the food and drinks are expensive.

Two Clinton ParkNew Rochelle390 units
9.2/ 10
7.9/ 10
RentCafe 5/5 · 3 reviews · rentcafe.com
RentCafe publishes 5/5 from 3 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.9.
7.9/ 10
RentCafe 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5 · 3 reviews · rentcafe.com
Combined from 6 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.9.

Google’s 4.3/5 from 76 reviews is the largest clearly published numeric review base and converts to 7.9/10 under the specified curve. The written feedback is mostly positive about staff, amenities, views, cleanliness and safety, while isolated reports describe management turnover and unresolved maintenance; those themes do not justify a further score movement. Structure and living are separately supported by the reported maintenance/upkeep and operational reviews, but neither has a larger independent rating base than the Google overall anchor.

+ Clean and well maintained+ Quiet building+ Competent maintenance staff+ Modern interiors+ Well-cared-for common environment
− Persistent dust complaint− Dishwasher failures− Maintenance work-order delays
+ Responsive staff+ Professional management+ Strong amenities+ Good views+ Resident events and community
− Management turnover− Unresponsive handling of one maintenance case− Parking wait-time complaint

Published resident feedback is mostly favorable about physical condition: one resident called the unit “clean, well-maintained” and the building “quiet and well cared for,” while another praised maintenance staff as “highly competent and efficient.” The counterexample reported persistent dust, missing window screens and repeated dishwasher failures, including a 4–5 day replacement delay; this is a serious individual maintenance account but not a published building-wide structural finding.

Day-to-day reviews are predominantly positive: residents describe staff as “friendly and responsive,” praise “great work area and lovely events,” and say leasing and move-in support were smooth and professional. The negative evidence is concentrated in one renter’s account of repeated unresolved work orders and one separate parking review saying the wait was “wayyyyy too long”; Bozzuto also surfaces a complaint about management turnover.

5 Cottage at AVE Hamilton GreenWhite Plains307 units
9.1/ 10
—/ 10
9.1/ 10

The building-specific Google aggregate of 4.6/5 from 14 reviews sets the level and converts to 8.8/10 under the requested curve. The written feedback is strongly positive on service, amenities and community, warranting a modest commentary uplift, while the lone negative review is not a recurring or severe failure.

+ Friendly staff+ Responsive maintenance+ Extensive amenities+ Resident events+ Community atmosphere
− High price− Construction views− Potential elevator waits

no notes returned

no links returned

Residents repeatedly describe the staff as “friendly,” “kind,” and going “above and beyond,” while another says maintenance was “very fast to respond” to minor issues. Amenities and programming are frequently praised, including the indoor pool, gym, golf simulator and organized activities; the main negative review complained about a “construction site,” high rents and limited elevator banks, but that complaint was not corroborated by another review in the material read.

MavenMott Haven, Bronx200 units
8.1/ 10
6.3/ 10
RentCafe 4/5 · 12 reviews · rentcafe.com
ApartmentRatings 2/5 · 1 review · apartmentratings.com
Combined from 2 published figures on 2 platforms, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.3.
6.9/ 10
RentCafe 4/5, 4.5/5, 4.5/5, 4.5/5 · 12 reviews · rentcafe.com
ApartmentRatings 1/5, 2/5, 2/5, 1/5, 4/5 · 1 review · apartmentratings.com
Combined from 9 published figures on 2 platforms, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.9.

Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest reported review base and sets the level at 4.4/5, converted to 8.2/10. The score is adjusted modestly downward for recurring operational complaints, with positive themes providing a smaller offset; physical structure is not scored because the published evidence is limited to maintenance and cleanliness observations rather than building systems.

− Dirty carpets and elevator mats− Building odor
+ Friendly staff+ Strong amenities+ Resident events+ Rooftop views+ Helpful concierge and leasing staff
− Unresponsive management− Dirty common areas− Noise and disruptive behavior− Smoking in halls or staircases− Inconsistent concierge coverage

Published resident feedback contains limited physical-condition evidence. One RentCafe review reported that carpets and elevator mats were filthy and that the building smelled “Gross!”, while ApartmentRatings published a 2/5 maintenance rating; no evidence was found about framework, plumbing, HVAC, electrical infrastructure, leaks or waterproofing.

Daily-life reviews are mixed. Positive reviewers describe staff as “kind, helpful and responsive,” praise the gym, play spaces, roof and community events, while negative reviews report that concierge staff are sometimes absent, the lounge is “sticky and dirty,” and management is unresponsive; RentCafe’s published living sub-scores were 4.5/5 for staff, value and noise, but ApartmentRatings published 1/5 staff and 2/5 noise ratings.

Eighty Nine DeKalbDowntown Brooklyn / Fort Greene, Brooklyn324 units
8.0/ 10
—/ 10
7.3/ 10
RentCafe 4.5/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4.5/5, 4.5/5 · 234 reviews · rentcafe.com
Combined from 7 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.3.

RentCafe provides the largest published review base, with a 4.0/5 building rating from 234 reviews, setting the 7.0 anchor. Bozzuto is more favorable but has only 17 ratings, while the 7-review Google result cannot anchor under the stated rule; the reported praise and limited AC criticism produce a modest net adjustment to 7.2. Structural scoring remains null because the material does not establish a separately scorable structural/system rating.

+ Modern building+ Well-maintained building+ New and fully equipped+ In-unit amenities reported
− AC issue reported− One review described decoration quality as average
+ Professional staff+ Friendly management+ Clean common areas+ Strong amenities+ Convenient transit/location
− AC issue reported

Residents described the building as “beautiful, modern, and well maintained,” while another review called it “new and fully equipped.” The available physical-condition criticism is limited: one resident was still working through “some ac issues,” and one short-stay review called the decoration average; no repeated severe structural or systems failure was published.

Day-to-day feedback is strongly favorable: residents called the ambience and cleanliness “exceptional,” described concierge and property management as “very professional,” and praised the gym, social spaces and location. Google-linked reviews similarly mention a “kind and thoughtful management team,” “friendly management,” transit access and inviting lobby; the main operational reservation in the material read was an unresolved AC issue.

55-15 Grand AvenueMaspeth, Queens, New York
7.1/ 10
—/ 10
7.1/ 10

The 4.1/5 building-specific aggregate from 115 reviews sets the level and converts to approximately 7.3/10 under the stated curve. The written reviews read are mostly negative about driver safety, street obstruction and staff conduct, so the reported score is adjusted modestly downward; no published structural rating was found.

+ Electric-van activity
− Unsafe driver conduct− Street obstruction− Rude staff interactions− Poor neighborhood relations

no notes returned

no links returned

The location listing shows a 4.1/5 aggregate, but the individual feedback is sharply mixed on day-to-day operations: reviewers report that drivers “block the street” and “drive dangerously,” while another calls the manager rude. A positive review says it was “Amazing to see dozens of electric vans coming and going at all times,” but this is one operational observation rather than repeated resident-style praise.

One Clinton ParkNew Rochelle352 units
6.7/ 10
7.4/ 10
RentCafe 5/5 · 1 review · rentcafe.com
RentCafe publishes 5/5 from 1 review. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.4.
7.6/ 10
Apartment List 4.7/5, 4.7/5 · 3 reviews · apartmentlist.com
RentCafe 5/5, 5/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 3/5 · 1 review · rentcafe.com
Combined from 8 published figures on 2 platforms, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 7.6.

Google’s 3.8/5 from 173 reviews is the largest qualifying review base and converts to 6.4/10. The reported praise and one serious security allegation move the evidence-based resident score modestly downward to 6.1; the RentCafe structural sub-score is based on only one review and is not used as the overall anchor.

+ Well-built building+ Excellent maintenance rating+ Modern apartments+ Good views
+ Responsive management+ Timely maintenance+ Friendly staff+ Modern amenities+ Package handling and resident app praised
− Questionable access control− Dirty dog park/common-area complaints− Broken coffee machine reported− Concierge criticized− Rushed leasing experience

The only direct physical-condition evidence is favorable: RentCafe reports “Maintenance 5.0” and a verified resident said the “Building is very well built,” while also praising the apartment and view. One Apartment List review called the building cleaner and quieter but criticized the dog park and recurring coffee-machine/soap issues; those are upkeep observations rather than evidence of structural or systems failure.

Published reviews describe a generally positive day-to-day experience for many residents: one called management “courteous and responsive,” with maintenance responding “in a timely manner,” while another praised friendly staff, modern amenities and careful package handling. The negative feedback is material but uneven: one reviewer alleged “filthy elevators,” dog waste, rodents and loose access control, and another said the dog park was unusable, the coffee machine was always broken and the concierge was not great.

Sawyer PlaceYonkers438 units
6.1/ 10
6.6/ 10
6.1/ 10

Google Reviews/Maps supplies the largest usable review-based aggregate, 3.8/5 from 171 reviews, which converts to approximately 6.2/10 and sets the level. The written feedback is materially mixed: repeated praise for staff, cleanliness and maintenance offsets repeated concerns about security, concierge coverage, amenity upkeep and disruptive residents, producing a small net downward adjustment.

+ Well-maintained building+ Clean common areas+ Fast maintenance reported+ Modern apartments and appliances+ Excellent condition reported
− Maintenance delays reported− Broken or unavailable amenity equipment− Occasional common-area cleaning concerns− Apartment cabinet and painting problems reported
+ Friendly professional staff+ Responsive management reported+ Concierge and package handling+ Strong gym and amenity offering+ Convenient transit and neighborhood location
− Security coverage concerns− Reduced concierge service reported− Amenities not consistently operational− Noise and smoking complaints− Inconsiderate residents reported

Structural feedback is more positive than negative: residents describe Sawyer Place as “always clean and well-maintained,” “in excellent condition,” and report that maintenance is “awesome and super quick.” However, separate reviews describe broken cabinet doors, delayed light-bulb service and amenities that were no longer functioning, so the evidence is not uniformly positive.

Daily-life reviews frequently praise the staff—one resident says they are “professional, courteous and easily available”—and describe the community as clean, welcoming and convenient to Metro-North. The negative side includes reports of “No security or doorman,” reduced concierge service, rowdy residents, smoking in amenities and broken equipment; the property manager said 24/7 concierge service was implemented in February, but that is a future/current commitment rather than proof that earlier complaints were resolved by the research date.

Only buildings that have reached handover are rated. 1 of 10 projects carries no rating: a building still under construction is never asked about, one that has just been handed over may not have been reached yet, and the rest were asked about and no published resident commentary was found. Structure is fixed at handover and stays the developer's; management and living belongs to whoever runs the building now. The overall verdict weights both rather than averaging them. None of this is checked: a rating is what people published about a building, aggregated — it is not evidence, it cannot move a delay figure, and it is not part of the delivery record above.

About

Company dossier

Legal name
RXR Realty LLC
Headquarters
75 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, United States
10019
Founded
2007
US
Entity type
PRIVATE
Revenue
not published
Business model
offplan for sale, build to sell institutional, commercial, mixed use, masterplan, contracting, other

Offices

head office and 3 others
UniondaleNew YorkApex

Sources: office cities

COMPANY2024-01-27

Contact - RXR

RXR
LONG ISLAND OFFICE 625 RXR Plaza Uniondale, NY 11556
value seen: LONG ISLAND OFFICE 625 RXR Plaza Uniondale, NY 11556
value paraphrased from this source
https://rxr.com/contact/
COMPANYdate not shown in source

Corporate Overview

RXR
75 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY Veridea Crossing, Apex, NC
value seen: Veridea Crossing, Apex, NC
value paraphrased from this source
https://rxr.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2-Corporate-Overview.pdf

Partners

4 partners
Vantage Airport Group
joint venture

Member of the JFK Millennium Partners consortium developing, building, and operating Terminal 6 at JFK.

American Triple I Partners
joint venture

Member of the JFK Millennium Partners consortium and infrastructure investor, owner, developer, and manager.

JetBlue
operator

Partner airline in the JFK Millennium Partners consortium; Terminal 6 is designed to integrate with JetBlue’s Terminal 5.

Liberty Mutual Investments
funder

RXR’s strategic credit partner targeting $1 billion of credit deployments; LMI also led RXR’s $250 million investment-grade corporate bond financing.

Sources: partners

COMPANYdate not shown in source

JFK T6 - JFK Millennium Partners

JFK Millennium Partners · carried by jfkt6.com
JFK Millennium Partners (JMP) is a private consortium consisting of Vantage Airport Group, American Triple I, RXR Realty, and our airline partner JetBlue.
value seen: Vantage Airport Group
https://jfkt6.com/

Sources: partners

COMPANYdate not shown in source

JFK T6 - JFK Millennium Partners

JFK Millennium Partners · carried by jfkt6.com
American Triple I Partners (ATI) is a New York-based investor, owner, developer, and manager of infrastructure assets and infrastructure-focused companies.
value seen: American Triple I Partners
https://jfkt6.com/

Sources: partners

COMPANYdate not shown in source

JFK T6 - JFK Millennium Partners

JFK Millennium Partners · carried by jfkt6.com
JetBlue is proud to be New York’s Hometown Airline® and the only major airline headquartered in New York.
value seen: JetBlue
https://jfkt6.com/

Sources: partners

COMPANY2025-08-14

RXR and Liberty Mutual Investments Announce Expanded Credit Partnership - RXR

RXR
RXR and Liberty Mutual Investments announced this week that they are expanding their long-term strategic partnership.
value seen: Liberty Mutual Investments
https://rxr.com/rxr-and-liberty-mutual-investments-announce-expanded-credit-partnership/

Registrations & licences

OTHER0001491681
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · US
Jurisdiction-agnostic: a DLD number, a Companies House number and a state RERA registration all land in the same table.

Contact

Markets

1 countries
United Statesactive 10 projects tracked

What they build

5 types
Residential, for rent7 of 10
Mixed use3 of 10
Retail3 of 10
Industrial2 of 10
Office1 of 10
A project counts once under each type it carries, so the shares add to more than the project count.

Management

Principals & executives

6 names found
SR
Scott Rechler
Scott Rechler leads RXR as Chairman and CEO. He previously chaired and led Reckson Associates Realty Corp.; RXR says it was founded in 2007 after the sale of Reckson to SL Green. His current external work includes civic, health-care, university and real-estate boards.
Current title
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
Reckson Associates Realty Corp
Education
Clark University
New York University Schack Institute
Other boards
Regional Plan AssociationNational September 11 Memorial and MuseumNorthwell HealthNYUReal Estate RoundtableReal Estate Board of New York
Known for
nothing tagged
https://linkedin.com/in/scottrechler
We take pride in having a strong set of values at our core, starting with our commitment to being part of the community and thinking long-term. LEADERS 2025https://www.leadersmag.com/issues/2025.1_Jan/PUR/LEADERS_Rechler_RXR.html?utm_campaign=RXR%20In%20the%20News&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_eN7NfqfwBZEIfsNI6AeQz2R3sr4KfIZX4CJOAN0YuaZslAom6PoGMLpCAvrqzV_pmJ_5Y

Sources: education

SOCIALdate not shown in source

Scott Rechler

LinkedIn
Scott is a graduate of Clark University and the New York University Schack Institute.
value seen: Clark University; New York University Schack Institute
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://linkedin.com/in/scottrechler

Sources: full name

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Our Company - RXR

RXR
### Scott Rechler
value seen: Scott Rechler
https://rxr.com/our-company/

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

Scott Rechler

LinkedIn
# Scott Rechler
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/scottrechler
https://linkedin.com/in/scottrechler

Sources: other boards

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Scott Rechler - RXR

RXR
Scott currently serves as chair of the Regional Plan Association, trustee and Vice Chair of the National September 11 th Memorial and Museum, and is on the Board of Trustees of New York University (NYU).
value seen: Regional Plan Association; National September 11 Memorial and Museum; Northwell Health; NYU; Real Estate Roundtable; Real Estate Board of New York
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxr.com/team/scott-rechler/

Sources: previous companies

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Scott Rechler - RXR

RXR
Before launching RXR, Scott was the Chair and CEO of Reckson Associates Realty Corp (NYSE: RA), a company he helped take public in 1995.
value seen: Reckson Associates Realty Corp
https://rxr.com/team/scott-rechler/

Sources: quote

PRESS2025-12-15

LEADERS Interview with Scott Rechler, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, RXR

LEADERS
We take pride in having a strong set of values at our core, starting with our commitment to being part of the community and thinking long-term.
value seen: We take pride in having a strong set of values at our core, starting with our commitment to being part of the community and thinking long-term.
https://www.leadersmag.com/issues/2025.1_Jan/PUR/LEADERS_Rechler_RXR.html?utm_campaign=RXR%20In%20the%20News&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_eN7NfqfwBZEIfsNI6AeQz2R3sr4KfIZX4CJOAN0YuaZslAom6PoGMLpCAvrqzV_pmJ_5Y

Sources: role type

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Our Company - RXR

RXR
### Scott Rechler Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
value seen: CEO
value paraphrased from this source
https://rxr.com/our-company/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Scott Rechler - RXR

RXR
Scott Rechler is the CEO and Chairman of RXR, a fully integrated real estate company and investment manager. Before launching RXR, Scott was the Chair and CEO of Reckson Associates Realty Corp (NYSE: RA). RXR was founded in 2007.
value seen: Scott Rechler leads RXR as Chairman and CEO. He previously chaired and led Reckson Associates Realty Corp.; RXR says it was founded in 2007 after the sale of Reckson to SL Green. His current external work includes civic, health-care, university and real-estate boards.
https://rxr.com/team/scott-rechler/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Our Company - RXR

RXR
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
value seen: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
https://rxr.com/our-company/
MM
Michael Maturo
Michael Maturo is a founding Managing Partner and President of RXR, overseeing corporate strategy, property operations, investment management and capital-markets activity. Before RXR, he was President and a director of Reckson, where RXR says he completed more than $50 billion in combined capital-markets transactions.
Current title
President
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
Reckson Associates Realty Corp
Education
not published
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
nothing tagged
https://linkedin.com/in/mmaturo

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

Michael Maturo

LinkedIn
# Michael Maturo
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/mmaturo
https://linkedin.com/in/mmaturo

Sources: previous companies

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Michael Maturo - RXR

RXR
Prior to the Reckson/SL Green merger, Mr. Maturo served as President and a member of the Board of Directors at Reckson.
value seen: Reckson Associates Realty Corp
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxr.com/team/michael-maturo/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Michael Maturo - RXR

RXR
Michael Maturo is a founding Managing Partner and President of RXR, overseeing corporate strategy, property operations, investment management and capital-markets activity. Before RXR, he was President and a director of Reckson, where RXR says he completed more than $50 billion in combined capital-markets transactions.
value seen: Michael Maturo is a founding Managing Partner and President of RXR, overseeing corporate strategy, property operations, investment management and capital-markets activity. Before RXR, he was President and a director of Reckson, where RXR says he completed more than $50 billion in combined capital-markets transactions.
https://rxr.com/team/michael-maturo/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Michael Maturo - RXR

RXR
# Michael Maturo President
value seen: President
https://rxr.com/team/michael-maturo/
JB
Jason Barnett
Jason Barnett is a founding managing partner and Vice Chairman of RXR, responsible for legal matters, transactions and corporate initiatives. He previously held senior legal and corporate-initiatives roles at Reckson and practiced at Sidley Austin Brown & Wood.
Current title
Vice Chairman, Chief Legal Officer
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
Reckson Associates Realty CorpSidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP
Education
Clark UniversityBachelor of Arts
Emory University School of LawJuris Doctor
London School of Economics
Other boards
Clark University Board of TrusteesLondon School of Economics North American Advisory Board
Known for
nothing tagged
https://linkedin.com/in/jason-barnett-6a499013

Sources: education

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Jason Barnett - RXR

RXR
Mr. Barnett earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Clark University, attended the London School of Economics and earned his Juris Doctor from Emory University School of Law.
value seen: Clark University; London School of Economics; Emory University School of Law
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxr.com/team/jason-barnett/

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

Jason Barnett

LinkedIn
# Jason Barnett
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/jason-barnett-6a499013
https://linkedin.com/in/jason-barnett-6a499013

Sources: other boards

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Jason Barnett - RXR

RXR
Mr. Barnett also serves on the Board of Trustees of Clark University, in Worcester, MA and as a member of London School of Economics North American Advisory Board.
value seen: Clark University Board of Trustees; London School of Economics North American Advisory Board
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxr.com/team/jason-barnett/

Sources: previous companies

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Jason Barnett - RXR

RXR
Prior to joining Reckson, Mr. Barnett practiced in the corporate and securities department of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP.
value seen: Reckson Associates Realty Corp; Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxr.com/team/jason-barnett/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Jason Barnett - RXR

RXR
Jason Barnett is a founding managing partner and Vice Chairman of RXR, responsible for legal matters, transactions and corporate initiatives. He previously held senior legal and corporate-initiatives roles at Reckson and practiced at Sidley Austin Brown & Wood.
value seen: Jason Barnett is a founding managing partner and Vice Chairman of RXR, responsible for legal matters, transactions and corporate initiatives. He previously held senior legal and corporate-initiatives roles at Reckson and practiced at Sidley Austin Brown & Wood.
https://rxr.com/team/jason-barnett/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Jason Barnett - RXR

RXR
# Jason Barnett Vice Chairman, Chief Legal Officer
value seen: Vice Chairman, Chief Legal Officer
https://rxr.com/team/jason-barnett/
TR
Todd Rechler
Todd Rechler is Chief Construction and Development Officer and President of RXR’s construction and development companies. RXR Construction and Development says he has been instrumental in managing more than 30 million square feet and is responsible for all RXR development and construction projects.
Current title
Chief Construction & Development Officer
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
Roger Williams UniversityB.S. in Industrial Technology
Other boards
Roger Williams University Board of TrusteesRWU Real Estate Advisory Board
Known for
nothing tagged
https://linkedin.com/in/rechler-todd-9005544a

Sources: education

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Todd Rechler - RXR Construction and Development

RXR
Todd received a B.S. in industrial technology from RWU.
value seen: Roger Williams University; B.S. in Industrial Technology
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxrbuilds.com/team/todd-rechler/

Sources: linkedin page

SOCIALdate not shown in source

Todd Rechler

LinkedIn
# Todd Rechler
value seen: https://linkedin.com/in/rechler-todd-9005544a
https://linkedin.com/in/rechler-todd-9005544a

Sources: other boards

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Todd Rechler - RXR Construction and Development

RXR
Todd has been a member of the RWU Board of Trustees since 2014. He is the Chair of the RWU Real Estate Advisory Board.
value seen: Roger Williams University Board of Trustees; RWU Real Estate Advisory Board
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxrbuilds.com/team/todd-rechler/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Todd Rechler - RXR

RXR
Todd Rechler is Chief Construction and Development Officer and President of RXR’s construction and development companies. RXR Construction and Development says he has been instrumental in managing more than 30 million square feet and is responsible for all RXR development and construction projects.
value seen: Todd Rechler is Chief Construction and Development Officer and President of RXR’s construction and development companies. RXR Construction and Development says he has been instrumental in managing more than 30 million square feet and is responsible for all RXR development and construction projects.
https://rxr.com/team/todd-rechler/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Todd Rechler - RXR

RXR
# Todd Rechler Chief Construction & Development Officer
value seen: Chief Construction & Development Officer
https://rxr.com/team/todd-rechler/
JM
Joanne Minieri
Joanne Minieri is RXR’s senior operating executive for development and construction services. Her prior career included 17 years at Forest City Ratner Companies, where she held CFO, COO and president roles and oversaw major retail, office, hotel and residential development.
Current title
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of RXR Development Services and RXR Construction and Development
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
Forest City Ratner CompaniesKenneth Leventhal & Company
Education
Hofstra UniversityBachelor of Business Administration
Other boards
Trinity Place HoldingsHofstra UniversityNEWNYU Schack Institute of Real Estate
Known for
nothing tagged

Sources: education

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Joanne Minieri - RXR

RXR
Ms. Minieri holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Hofstra University.
value seen: Hofstra University; Bachelor of Business Administration
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxr.com/team/joanne-minieri/

Sources: other boards

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Joanne Minieri - RXR

RXR
She is also on the Board of Trinity Place Holdings, Inc., Hofstra University, NEW (Non­Traditional Employment of Women) and NYU Schack Institute of Real Estate.
value seen: Trinity Place Holdings; Hofstra University; NEW; NYU Schack Institute of Real Estate
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxr.com/team/joanne-minieri/

Sources: previous companies

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Joanne Minieri - RXR

RXR
Previously, Ms. Minieri worked for Kenneth Leventhal & Company. Ms. Minieri enjoyed a 17-year tenure at Forest City Ratner Companies.
value seen: Forest City Ratner Companies; Kenneth Leventhal & Company
held out of the figures · the quote does not carry this value
https://rxr.com/team/joanne-minieri/

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Joanne Minieri - RXR

RXR
Joanne Minieri is RXR’s senior operating executive for development and construction services. Her prior career included 17 years at Forest City Ratner Companies, where she held CFO, COO and president roles and oversaw major retail, office, hotel and residential development.
value seen: Joanne Minieri is RXR’s senior operating executive for development and construction services. Her prior career included 17 years at Forest City Ratner Companies, where she held CFO, COO and president roles and oversaw major retail, office, hotel and residential development.
https://rxr.com/team/joanne-minieri/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Joanne Minieri - RXR

RXR
# Joanne Minieri Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of RXR Development Services and RXR Construction and Development
value seen: Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of RXR Development Services and RXR Construction and Development
https://rxr.com/team/joanne-minieri/
HL
Harold Lamm
Harold Lamm is identified by RXR as its Chief Financial Officer. The available current RXR profile provides no further professional biography, education, prior-company history, board information, role start date or public work email.
Current title
Chief Financial Officer
Experience
no career length stated
Companies before
none sourced
Education
not published
Other boards
none sourced
Known for
nothing tagged

Sources: summary

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Harold Lamm - RXR

RXR
Harold Lamm is identified by RXR as its Chief Financial Officer. The available current RXR profile provides no further professional biography, education, prior-company history, board information, role start date or public work email.
value seen: Harold Lamm is identified by RXR as its Chief Financial Officer. The available current RXR profile provides no further professional biography, education, prior-company history, board information, role start date or public work email.
https://rxr.com/team/harold-lamm/

Sources: title

COMPANYdate not shown in source

Harold Lamm - RXR

RXR
# Harold Lamm Chief Financial Officer
value seen: Chief Financial Officer
https://rxr.com/team/harold-lamm/

Projects

Assessment coverage

Completed projects: 2016-10-15 through 2026-10-15. Initial research is capped at 10 completed projects and a separate delivery-risk search capped at 7 findings. Risk findings are not project assessment counts. Absence is not proof of a complete portfolio or no failures. Month-level dates overlapping a boundary are excluded from figures.

0 undated completions and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.

Stalled, cancelled & overdue projects

0 evidenced cases
The capped delivery-risk search ran; no project-level exception cases are recorded here. Risk findings are listed under Risks and are separate from assessed projects. This does not establish that the developer has no delivery failures.

Completed projects

10 projects
ProjectLocationTypeUnitsFloorsAreaCostPayment planLaunchedConstruction startOriginal targetHandoverDelayConfidenceStatus
Eighty Nine DeKalbBrooklyn, United States
Downtown Brooklyn / Fort Greene
residential for rent, mixed use324130—————Jan 2025 – Dec 2025Jul 2026+12.5 mo
(+7.0 to +18.0)
estimatedcompleted
Red Hook Logistics CenterNew York, United States
Red Hook, Brooklyn
industrial——385,510 sq ft————Jul 2024 – Sep 2024Mar 2025+7.0 mo
(+6.0 to +8.0)
estimatedcompleted
25 Cottage at AVE Hamilton GreenWhite Plains, United States
residential for rent170112———2022December 2022Oct 2024Jan 2025 – Dec 2025+8.5 mo
(+3.0 to +14.0)
sourcedcompleted
5 Cottage at AVE Hamilton GreenWhite Plains, United States
residential for rent307126———2022December 2022Sep 2025 – Nov 2025Jan 2025 – Dec 2025−3.5 mo
(−10.0 to +3.0)
sourcedcompleted
Two Clinton ParkNew Rochelle, United States
residential for rent, retail390128———2021November 2021Sep 2023 – Nov 2023Jul 2024+9.0 mo
(+8.0 to +10.0)
sourcedcompleted
MavenBronx, United States
Mott Haven
residential for rent, mixed use200127145,643 sq ftUSD 75.2m
construction loan
—2021October 2021Jan 2023 – Dec 2023Oct 2023+3.5 mo
(−2.0 to +9.0)
estimatedcompleted
One Clinton ParkNew Rochelle, United States
residential for rent, retail3521————2019Oct. 30, 2019—Jul 2022—not scorablecompleted
55-15 Grand AvenueNew York, United States
Maspeth, Queens
industrial—————2020November 2020Dec 2022Jan 2022 – Dec 2022−5.5 mo
(−11.0 to 0.0)
sourcedcompleted
Pier 57New York, United States
office, retail, mixed use—————2016March 2016Jan 2018 – Apr 2018Jan 2022 – Dec 2022+52.0 mo
(+45.0 to +59.0)
sourcedcompleted
Sawyer PlaceYonkers, United States
residential for rent4381——USD 190m
estimated cost
—2016December 2016Oct 2018 – Dec 2018Jan 2020 – Dec 2020+19.5 mo
(+13.0 to +26.0)
sourcedcompleted
Click any row for the sources behind it. Cost basis matters: an estimated cost, a construction loan and a sale price are different numbers. Each row states which one it is, so they are never averaged together.

Awards

Awards & recognition

7 found
PROJECT AWARD Winner March 26, 2025
2025 CoStar Impact Award — Lease of the Year, New York City · 1285 Avenue of the Americas
The Ropes & Gray lease at RXR-owned 1285 Avenue of the Americas was selected as New York’s 2025 Lease of the Year by an independent panel of local real-estate professionals.
PROJECT AWARD Winner 2024
Public-Private Partnership of the Year · Two Clinton Park
RXR and the City of New Rochelle won the award for the opening of Two Clinton Park in New Rochelle, New York.
COMPANY AWARD Winner 2024
Innovation in Office Award
RXR won the Innovation in Office Award for its RXO tenant-experience program.
PROJECT AWARD Winner December 1, 2023
Excellence in Historic Preservation Award · Pier 57
The rehabilitation of Pier 57 received the League’s 2023 award, and the awarding body identifies RXR as the project’s developer within the partnership that delivered the adaptive-reuse project.
GOVERNMENT RECOGNITION Winner January 3, 2023 (award year 2022)
2022 New York State Preservation Award · Pier 57
Pier 57 was one of ten projects selected for recognition for preservation work; the project’s restoration was led by a joint venture including RXR.
New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation · https://hudsonriverpark.org/app/uploads/2023/01/Pier-57-NYS-Preservation-Award-Release.pdf
SUSTAINABILITY Winner March 26, 2024
ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year Award
RXR was recognized among the 2024 ENERGY STAR award winners for integrating ENERGY STAR into its energy-management program and promoting energy-performance metrics to tenants and internal stakeholders.
GOVERNMENT RECOGNITION Winner September 25, 2023
Development Impact Award · Downtown New Rochelle master plan and revitalization
The New York Housing Conference recognized the City of New Rochelle master plan and RXR for RXR’s role as master developer in the downtown revitalization effort.

Risks

Risk flags

10 found
FINANCIAL DISTRESS Default reported May 20, 2024; auction and loss of control reported March 17, 2025.
RXR and partners defaulted on the $315 million mortgage secured by 340 Madison Avenue after failing to pay at maturity and after an extension; MassMutual sought foreclosure, and Barings later bought the property at auction for $161 million, causing RXR to lose control of the building.
FINANCIAL DISTRESS Default/maturity December 8, 2023; foreclosure reported December 4, 2024; vacancy update reported July 8, 2025.
The $670 million loan secured by RXR’s Helmsley Building reached maturity on December 8, 2023, was transferred to special servicing, and lenders filed a foreclosure action after a forbearance expired; RXR said it remained in constructive discussions with lenders, while later reporting said vacancy rose to 44%.
PROJECT CANCELLED March 5, 2025.
Riverhead’s Town Board rescinded the resolutions naming RXR and Georgica Green Ventures joint master developers for the railroad-station-area redevelopment after the proposed master-developer agreement was never fully executed; officials said the town needed a clean slate and reported no movement from RXR.
DELIVERY DELAY Reported March 15, 2022; lawsuit filed March 1, 2022 and stipulation reported March 3, 2022.
A theater, exhibition and classroom project in RXR’s New Rochelle development fell behind schedule; RXR issued a lease-default and vacate notice to the Venezuelan American Endowment, which alleged that pandemic and city-related delays were responsible, and the parties temporarily agreed to drop their demands while discussing settlement or mediation.
LEGAL September 2, 2022.
RXR sued construction manager Hudson Meridian over alleged defective waterproofing installation and inadequate supervision at the completed 360 Huguenot/587 Main Street project, claiming tenant water infiltration and estimated repair costs of $4 million to $5 million; Hudson Meridian denied responsibility and said it was working on a redesign and repairs.
PROJECT CANCELLED 2026-03-30 (county publication; referring to the 2018 RXR proposal)
RXR Realty’s 2018 Nassau Hub proposal in Uniondale was cancelled/not realized; Nassau County stated in March 2026 that none of the proposals, including RXR’s, had been realized and described development as stalled.
PROJECT CANCELLED 2025-03-05; status reaffirmed 2026-07-06
The proposed Railroad Avenue transit-oriented redevelopment in Riverhead, for which RXR and Georgica Green Ventures had been designated joint master developers, was abandoned in its approved form after the town rescinded the designation because the master-development agreement was never fully executed; the town reopened the property to proposals.
PROJECT CANCELLED 2018-09-05 filing, reported 2018-09-06
RXR Realty’s joint redevelopment projects with Renaissance Downtowns in Hempstead Village and Huntington Station were stated by RXR in its 2018 lawsuit not to be going forward or completed, after the partners’ dispute and alleged lack of meaningful development; those allegations were contested by Renaissance and involved the joint venture RDRXR LLC.
PROJECT CANCELLED 2026-08-27 (reporting the April 2026 sale and new plans)
RXR Realty’s planned residential/retail redevelopment of 47 Hall Street in Brooklyn did not proceed under RXR: after pandemic-related failure of its office-conversion plan and a prolonged vacancy, RXR sold the site in April 2026 at a substantial discount, and the new owner filed materially different plans.
DELIVERY DELAY 2026-01-20 city presentation; 2026-04-07 reporting
RXR and TF Cornerstone’s 175 Park Avenue tower remained undelivered after the developers’ public expectation of beginning construction by the end of 2025; a January 2026 city presentation instead anticipated construction in June 2026, while April reporting said RXR had only filed initial permits and still faced financing and tenant conditions.

Record status

active
Coverageactive
Tracked sinceOctober 10, 2026
Last checkedOctober 15, 2026 this month
Profile last researchedOctober 15, 2026
Claim
Work for this company? Claiming lets you correct the record with sources and get alerts when it changes.
For informational purposes only. This information is not investment, financial or credit advice and should not be relied on for investment, lending or credit decisions. Records may be incomplete or outdated. Verify information independently and seek qualified advice before making a decision.