no notes returned

Published guest feedback describes a lively daily experience: reviewers repeatedly praise the live bands, line-dancing lessons, large dance floor and attentive named servers; one review called the atmosphere “a 10/10,” while another said the staff “worked hard to make us feel welcome.” The main qualifications are that food was “ok, nothing special,” service could be slow during a crowded Saturday, and one Yelp excerpt reports an unsatisfactory ID check at the door.

no notes returned

Published reviews consistently describe a lively guest experience: visitors praised the “friendly howdy welcome,” live entertainment, rooftop views and staff who were “friendly and knowledgeable.” The main operational criticisms were value and consistency: one guest objected to a $17 beer and “no country music,” while another reported that the brisket and shared meat platter were “mostly dry”; a later review summary also cites overpriced drinks and uneven service.

The published material does not provide a building-fabric or systems rating. Guest reports do describe temporary physical disruption during enhancement work: one reviewer reported that “heavy construction equipment” woke them, while another cited construction-related parking and lobby-access problems; these are operational renovation impacts rather than evidence of a structural defect.

Daily experience is generally strong for a large resort: guests repeatedly describe “friendly” or “amazing” staff, clean grounds, and enjoyable pools and water amenities. The negative feedback is concentrated in service friction and scale—one guest reported that the staff was “not responsive,” while others described long check-in waits, limited food choices, pool-area litter, and construction noise or access problems.

The strongest physical-condition feedback is negative: a residence reviewer reported “AC that can't keep up with Austin temps” and “elevators that constantly break down.” Separately, the renovation was published as completed: the public-space work finished in Fall 2024 and the guestroom tower in January 2025; these are completion statements, not resident-condition ratings.

Daily-life feedback is split: one reviewer described the residence as “Upscale, and classy,” while another said the front-desk employee was “unhelpful” and “condescending”; a separate review called the concierge attitude a “MAJOR attitude problem.” Hotel guests also praised the fitness center, nightlife and sophisticated bar, but Google’s summary says some guests disliked the air conditioning.

The renovation source reports that the 18,273-square-foot Governor’s Ballroom and more than 9,000 square feet of pre-function space received new paint, wallcoverings, millwork door panels, operable partitions and a GFRG ceiling with controllable lighting. Guest reviews are not engineering inspections, but they include “problems with the plumbing,” a bathroom leak, a slow-draining sink and other room-maintenance defects elsewhere in the resort; no review specifically attributes those defects to the renovated ballroom.

Guests consistently describe the resort’s atriums, gardens and amenities as impressive, and several praise staff as “fabulous” or “very pleasant and helpful.” Operational complaints include an hour-long food-service queue, reservation errors, missing towels, pest reports and a review alleging that “a security guard just entered our room”; these are resort-level reviews rather than ballroom-specific feedback.

Published renovation reporting says the project began in March 2024 and was complete and open in January 2025, covering more than 1,400 rooms, a 22,000-square-foot lobby, two ballrooms and restaurants. Guest feedback described rooms as “nicely renovated,” while Tripadvisor’s published aspect scores were Rooms 4.2/5 and Cleanliness 4.4/5; no review evidence reported leaks, plumbing, HVAC, electrical or other serious physical-system failures.

Booking.com’s displayed guest feedback praised the renovation (“We loved renovations”), called the staff “excellent,” and described the property as “spotless and beautiful,” with facilities 9.4/10 and staff 9.3/10. Tripadvisor’s review summary is more qualified, citing “high costs and additional fees,” construction/party noise, and service that can be slow or inconsistent.

Reviewers commonly describe the rooms as “spacious and clean,” with one reporting that the “A/C worked great.” However, a serious single-review report alleged “NO ELECTRICITY, NO HEATING / AC, NO Hot water for extended periods (over 5 hours)” on April 30, 2025; the available material does not establish that this was recurring.

Guests praise the “excellent” pool and water park, extensive activities, attractive views and staff who were “excellent” or “incredibly friendly.” Daily experience is uneven: reviewers report that the front desk was “overwhelmed,” restaurant waits were long, and a billing inquiry remained unresolved for 11 days, while another review said the resort was “beautiful” but food and drinks were extremely expensive.

Published guest feedback generally describes the property as clean, spacious and well maintained: one Booking.com reviewer called it “Very clean,” while another said maintenance “came immediately and fixed” excessive room venting. Counterevidence includes a ripped sofa bed, intermittent cable, an HVAC-related pool closure report, and one serious but uncorroborated bed-bug allegation; these are guest reports, not an engineering inspection.

Guests frequently praise the water park, lazy river, fire pits, views and helpful staff; one described the resort as having “amenities... outstanding” and “staff... excellent.” Daily operations are uneven: reviewers report restaurant waits of “1.5 hrs in ALL the restaurants,” unresolved billing inquiries, expensive food and parking, and inconsistent front-desk communication.