SingLand develops and invests in commercial offices, retail properties, residential projects, hotels and information-technology services, primarily in Singapore and selected gateway markets including Australia, China and the United Kingdom, serving homeowners, tenants, businesses and hotel guests.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
AI-researched delivery record, not yet confirmed by the developer. Dates may be approximate; original sources are linked.
AI research over published reviews and resident comments. Scores are a model’s reading of opinion, not figures stated on a page, and nothing here feeds any number above it. The links under each block are the pages that research says it used. Based on available resident reviews of covered buildings. These are reported experiences, not independent building inspections, and may not represent all residents or properties.
| Project | Overall | Structure & systems | Management & living |
|---|---|---|---|
| ClavonClementi, Singapore640 units | 9.7/ 10 | —/ 10 | 9.7/ 10 |
99.co provides the largest published review base found, with 4.9/5 from 20 reviews; applying the stated conversion curve gives an anchor of 9.5/10. The score is moved modestly upward for repeated praise about amenities and location, but confidence is limited because many visible comments are launch/show-flat observations and the older detailed reviews describe planned or prospective living conditions. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Published comments describe Clavon as “stunning” with “truly impressive” amenities, and one post highlights the many function rooms and study/work areas with charging points. The detailed review material also flags that the pool faces the AYE and “wouldn't exactly be the quiet oasis,” while the MRT walk is a drawback; these are largely pre-completion or early-launch observations, not a robust current resident-management record. | ||
| The Clement CanopyDistrict 5, Singapore505 units | 8.4/ 10 | —/ 10 | 7.9/ 10 |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest review base at 4.4/5 from 118 reviews, converting to an 8.1 anchor under the specified curve. The reported operational complaints modestly reduce that level, while repeated praise for the facilities, quietness, upkeep and shuttle partly offsets them; no published building-condition evidence supports a separate structure score. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Daily-life feedback is predominantly favorable: residents describe the condo as “well maintained, quiet” and praise its pools, tennis court, study and entertainment rooms, gardens and shuttle to Clementi MRT. The operational complaints are specific rather than universal: two reviews mention security staff being “condescending” or “rude,” and another says facilities-deposit refunds took “several month[s]” with no cooperation; one review also says “Facilities should be improved.” | ||
| UIC BuildingSingapore | 8.2/ 10 | —/ 10 | 8.2/ 10 |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest and only directly identified building-level aggregate: 4.3/5 from 90 reviews, converted to a 7.9 anchor. The written feedback adds recurring praise for security and cleanliness/facilities, with no complaint theme meeting the required recurring-negative threshold, producing an 8.2 overall and living score; structure remains unscored because the material does not establish broad structural performance. | |||
Reviews describe "card entry, fast lifts" and good facilities, but one reviewer said the connecting escalator "always breaks down" and that the adjacent stairway was dark and hazardous. Another reported that toilet locks could "come loose and unlock by itself"; these are isolated operational observations rather than evidence of a broad structural defect. | Day-to-day feedback is generally positive: one reviewer called it a "great office building" with "friendly and helpful" security, clean toilets and good CBD food options, while another praised the facilities and sea views. Counterpoints include a review describing "Very poor security services" and another saying access was inconvenient because of uncovered walkways, construction and taxi drop-off confusion. | ||
| AMO ResidenceDistrict 20, Singapore372 units | 8.1/ 10 | 6.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 4.2/5, 4.2/5 · no review count · propertyguru.com.sg Combined from 2 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.9. | 6.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 4.2/5, 4.1/5, 4.3/5, 4.1/5 · no review count · propertyguru.com.sg Combined from 4 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.9. |
PropertyGuru’s building-level 4.2/5 rating based on 15 reviews is the largest qualifying review base and converts to 7.8/10 under the specified curve. The reviewed comments are strongly positive about the building’s landscaping, facilities, layouts and staff, with limited deductions for the longer practical MRT walk and nearby construction/view uncertainty; the evidence supports an overall 8.1/10, while structure and living are shown separately. | |||
Published resident feedback is positive about the physical product: one reviewer said the building was “well maintained” and had “high quality fixtures,” while another reported “minimal defects.” No review read reported flooding, leaks, lift failures, plumbing problems, HVAC faults or electrical failures; the construction-noise concern relates to nearby future works rather than a reported building-system failure. | Residents commonly describe AMO Residence as peaceful, landscaped and family-friendly; one wrote that “the condo itself is peaceful with lots of nice landscaping and community spaces,” and another reported “no issues with building management.” The main operational drawback is access: reviewers described the walk to Mayflower as “12-14 mins,” while another warned that nearby construction could mean noise and reduced park views; these are current or future-location concerns, not evidence of failed management. | ||
| Avenue South ResidenceSingapore1,074 units | 7.8/ 10 | 6.6/ 10 PropertyGuru 3.9/5 · 16 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 3.9/5 from 16 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 6.6. | 6.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 4.1/5, 4.1/5, 4.3/5, 4.1/5, 3.8/5 · 16 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg Combined from 5 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.9. |
Google Reviews/Maps supplies the largest qualifying review base, 4.3/5 from 138 reviews, which converts to 7.9 under the requested curve. PropertyGuru is materially lower but has only 16 reviews and is excluded from scoring as a property portal; the reported recurring complaints and praise produce a small net downward commentary adjustment. The structural and living figures are set to the same evidence-led resident-experience level because the published material provides both building-condition and day-to-day observations, without a separate sufficiently large structure-only anchor. | |||
PropertyGuru publishes an Interior / Units rating of 3.9/5 and includes a review saying, “Wood cabinets are cheaply built and infested with termites.” A separate resident account says the termite problem affected some neighbours but not that resident, and reports that UOL was efficiently rectifying affected units; the available evidence is therefore mixed and partly old rather than a confirmed current estate-wide condition. | Reviews consistently praise the location, views and amenities: one Google reviewer called it “a great place to live” and highlighted the infinity pool, karaoke rooms and function rooms, while another praised the Rail Corridor. The negative evidence is operationally important but mixed in recency: PropertyGuru reports “5+ appointments” to solve one issue and a reviewer described a “Badly run estate,” while the Google review set also says facilities can be crowded. | ||
| The Watergardens at CanberraDistrict 27, Singapore448 units | 7.4/ 10 | —/ 10 | 6.5/ 10 |
PropertyGuru supplies the only building-specific review aggregate found: 5.0/5 from one resident review. Because the anchor has fewer than 10 reviews, the score is constrained to the required one-point band around 6.5; the single positive comment supports the living assessment but is insufficient to justify a higher resident-experience score. No published material provides a defensible structure score. | Not found in sources: Limited immediate retail reported in forum commentary | ||
The available published material describes a low-rise, five-storey development with landscaped water and garden features, but it does not provide a resident-reported assessment of plumbing, HVAC, electrical systems, leaks or waterproofing. Stacked Homes observed that some blocks are as close as 6 m and that this could “hinder the airflow” and compromise privacy; the publication also noted that a tennis court is absent. | The only written resident review read was favourable: “Nice cozy quiet life, away from the busy stressful city office work,” with the reviewer also mentioning hearing a rooster and seeing its chicks. The earlier independent review praised the pools, gardens, gym and family facilities, while cautioning that the location is “not Watergardens’ strongest suit” for drivers because it is distant from major expressways; current day-to-day management and maintenance remain weakly evidenced. | ||
| Alex ResidencesDistrict 3, Singapore429 units | 7.3/ 10 | 6.5/ 10 PropertyGuru 3.8/5 · 4 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 3.8/5 from 4 reviews. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 6.5. | 6.9/ 10 PropertyGuru 4/5, 3.8/5, 4.3/5, 4.3/5 · 4 reviews · propertyguru.com.sg Combined from 4 published figures on 1 platform, weighted by review count, adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint where reviews are few: 6.9. |
PropertyGuru’s building-level aggregate of 4/5 from 4 reviews sets the anchor, converting to 7/10; because the review base is below ten, the result is kept within one point of 6.5. The written reviews and published commentary are positive about views, the rooftop pool, transport and management, with no recurring resident complaint reported, producing a modest upward adjustment to 7.3. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Published reviews repeatedly praise the rooftop infinity pool and views: one reviewer called the high-floor view “breathtaking,” while another described the top-floor experience as “unforgettable.” Daily convenience also reviews well, with praise for the short walk to Redhill MRT and nearby hawker food, and one reviewer said management was “very responsive and address any issues promptly.” | ||
| Pollen & Bleu10, Singapore106 units | 7.0/ 10 | —/ 10 | 7.0/ 10 |
The Google Reviews/Maps aggregate of 4/5 from 29 reviews sets the level, converting to 7/10 under the specified curve. The reported commentary is broadly balanced: repeated praise for quietness and upkeep offsets, but does not fully eliminate, repeated management criticism; there is no published structural rating or sufficient structural evidence to score structure. | |||
no notes returned no links returned | Residents describe a “very nice environment” with “good neighbors,” and another review calls the development “well maintained,” quiet and suitable for families and couples. The negative operational feedback is specific: the managing agent was described as “not helpful,” delivery riders were reportedly barred from the basement carpark, and one resident said weekday reconstruction made it “impossible to live here” because of jackhammer noise. | ||
| The Tre VerPotong Pasir, Singapore729 units | 6.6/ 10 | 7.7/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · no review count · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 with no review count. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.7. | 7.7/ 10 PropertyGuru 5/5 · no review count · propertyguru.com.sg PropertyGuru publishes 5/5 with no review count. Adjusted for where resident ratings usually fall, and weighted toward the 6.5 midpoint (more strongly the fewer the reviews), that gives 7.7. |
Google Reviews/Maps provides the largest published review base at 3.6/5 from 60 reviews, converted to 5.8/10 under the stated curve. The score is moved down by recurring termite evidence and reported defects, leaks, management and security complaints, with a limited offset for repeated praise of the quiet landscaped setting, facilities and improved management; the PropertyGuru rating is reported but excluded because its base is under 10 reviews. | |||
Published resident and reporting evidence identifies physical defects rather than an absence of issues. One review says, “In just one year, the bathroom has leaked twice,” while a 2026 report records recurring drywood-termite cases in wardrobes and cabinets, including a resident saying the termites kept reappearing after frass was cleared; the same report states The Tre Ver was assessed as CONQUAS Band 3. | Daily-life reviews praise the “great views” and quiet setting, and one long-term resident says the newer management team is “more efficient” and checks the estate daily. Negative operational feedback includes a reviewer who said management kept an app deposit for three months and another who described security as “rough and rude”; a separate resident discussion reported clearly audible CTE traffic from some river-facing units. |
Residential and commercial joint-venture development and investment partner.
Joint-venture partner in residential developments including AMO Residence and the Shanghai site.
Joint-venture partner in residential and mixed-use site acquisition and development.
Commercial-component partner in the Hougang Central integrated development.
Joint-venture partner in the Shanghai Hongkou residential development.
Awarded the Hougang Central integrated residential and commercial site tender to a consortium including SingLand’s indirect joint venture company.
| COMPANY NUMBER | 196300181E Singapore · SG · Live |
| Singapore | active 9 projects tracked |
| Australia | active 0 projects tracked |
| China | active 0 projects tracked |
| United Kingdom | active 0 projects tracked |
| Residential, for sale | 8 of 9 |
| Retail | 1 of 9 |
| Office | 1 of 9 |
Bachelor of Arts (Economics), Clark University, USA
Wee Ee Lim
United Overseas Bank Limited (Director)
Wee Foundation (Director)
Haw Par Corporation Limited (Director, President and Chief Executive Officer)
UOL Group Limited (Chairman)
Mr Wee joined the Haw Par Group in 1986 and was appointed... President and Chief Executive Officer in 2003.
Chairman, Non-Executive and Non-Independent
Chairman from 31 March 2023
Mr Wee is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Haw Par Corporation Limited... Mr Wee was appointed Chairman of UOL on 27 February 2024.
Chairman
Haw Par President & CEO
UOL Chairman
Chairman, Non-Executive and Non-Independent
Bachelor of Science (Economics and concentrations in Finance and Operations & Information Management), Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Eu Zai Jie, Jonathan
Chief Executive Officer at Singapore Land Group ... (Current)
Access SG Ltd. (Director)
Urban Land Institute Singapore (Executive Committee Vice Chair)
Council for Board Diversity (member)
Before joining SingLand, Mr Eu was the General Manager, Investment and Asset Management of UOL Group Limited
UOL Group Limited
Chief Executive Officer; Executive and Non-Independent Director
CEO from 2021
Jonathan is responsible for setting the Group’s overall strategy, and ensuring delivery of its corporate purpose. He joined SingLand in 2020 as the Chief Operating Officer. Prior to SingLand, he dedicated a decade to UOL Group Limited...
CEO
ex-UOL
Wharton economics
ULI Singapore
Chief Executive Officer; Executive and Non-Independent Director
Bachelor of Science (Applied Science), Pennsylvania Engineering School, USA
Bachelor of Science (Applied Science), Pennsylvania Engineering School, USA
Bachelor of Science (Applied Science), Pennsylvania Engineering School, USA
Lance Yu Gokongwei
JG Summit Holdings, Inc. (President and CEO, Director)
Mr. Lance Y. Gokongwei... is the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of JGSHI
Cebu Air, Inc. (Chairman)
Universal Robina Corporation (Chairman)
Robinsons Land Corporation (Chairman)
JG Summit Olefins Corporation (Chairman)
Gokongwei Brothers Foundation, Inc. (Chairman and Trustee)
Non-Executive and Non-Independent Director
Director from 28 May 1999
Mr Lance Yu Gokongwei, first appointed as Director on 28 May 1999... JG Summit Holdings, Inc. (President and Chief Executive Officer, Director)
Long-serving director
JG Summit President & CEO
Property-group chairman
Non-Executive and Non-Independent Director
Bachelor of Architecture, University of Singapore
Liam Wee Sin
UOL Group Limited (Director and Group Chief Executive)
Mr Liam, aged 67... was appointed Group Chief Executive of UOL in 2019. He serves on UOL Board of Directors
UOL subsidiaries (Director)
Group Chief Executive of UOL; Non-Executive and Non-Independent Director of SingLand
Director from 10 June 2019
Mr Liam was appointed Group Chief Executive of UOL Group Limited in 2019... In his over 30 years of service with the Group, Mr Liam has led and strengthened the Group’s position...
UOL Group Chief Executive
30+ years at UOL
Property & hospitality
Group Chief Executive of UOL; Non-Executive and Non-Independent Director of SingLand
Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Applied Chemistry, University of Singapore
Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Applied Chemistry, University of Singapore
Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Applied Chemistry, University of Singapore
Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Applied Chemistry, University of Singapore
Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Applied Chemistry, University of Singapore
Chng Hwee Hong
Chng Hwee Hong was Executive Director of Haw Par Corporation Limited... before his retirement in March 2012.
Haw Par Corporation Limited
Non-Executive and Independent Director
Director from 23 March 2018
Mr Chng was an Executive Director of Haw Par Corporation Limited prior to his retirement in 2012. He was a member of the Sub-Committee on Maximising Value from Land as a Scarce Resource...
Independent director
ex-Haw Par executive director
Governance / public service
Non-Executive and Independent Director
Bachelor of Commerce (Accountancy), Nanyang University
Tan Khiaw Ngoh
Singapore Children’s Society (Deputy Chairman; Awards and Audit & Risk Committee Chair)
Straco Corporation Limited (Independent Non-Executive Director)
Khong Guan Limited (Independent Non-Executive Director)
Assurity Trusted Solutions Pte Ltd (Audit & Risk Committee Chair)
Thye Hua Kwan Nursing Home Limited (Director)
Ang Mo Kio-Thye Hua Kwan Hospital Ltd (Director)
PwC Singapore
She was an audit partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and has more than 35 years of experience in the audit profession
Non-Executive and Independent Director; Audit & Risk Committee Chairperson
Director from 27 February 2020
Ms Tan is a Justice of the Peace and a fellow Member of the Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants... Singapore Children’s Society (Board Member, Chairman of Audit & Risk Committee...)
Audit & Risk Chair
ex-PwC audit partner
Chartered accountant
Non-Executive and Independent Director; Audit & Risk Committee Chairperson
1 undated completions and 0 boundary-uncertain completions are retained but excluded from figures.
| Project | Location | Type | Units | Floors | Area | Cost | Payment plan | Launched | Construction start | Original target | Handover | Delay | Confidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMO Residence | Singapore, Singapore District 20 | residential for sale | 3721 | 25 | — | — | Normal Payment Scheme (NPS)1 | 2022 | 23 July 2022 | Jul 2025 – Dec 2025 | Oct 2025 | +0.5 mo (−2.0 to +3.0) | sourced | completed |
| The Watergardens at Canberra | Singapore, Singapore District 27 | residential for sale | 4481 | five-storey | — | — | Normal Payment Scheme (NPS)1 | 2021 | 28 August 2021 | Apr 2026 – Jun 2026 | Dec 2024 | more than 9 months early | estimated | completed |
| Clavon | Singapore, Singapore Clementi | residential for sale | 6401 | 37 | — | — | Normal Payment Scheme (NPS)1 | 2020 | 12 December 2020 | Jan 2025 – Mar 2025 | Apr 2024 | more than 9 months early | estimated | completed |
| Avenue South Residence | Singapore, Singapore | residential for sale, retail | 1,0741 | 56 | — | — | Normal Payment Scheme (NPS)1 | 2019 | September 2019 | Apr 2023 – Jun 2023 | Jul 2023 – Sep 2023 | +3.0 mo (+1.0 to +5.0) | sourced | completed |
| The Tre Ver | Singapore, Singapore Potong Pasir | residential for sale | 7291 | — | 52,391 m² | — | 5% (Booking Fee) + 20% less Booking Fee + 10% + 10% + 5% + 5% + 5% + 5% + 25% + 15%1 | 2018 | 4 August 2018 | — | Jan 2022 – Dec 2022 | — | not scorable | completed |
| The Clement Canopy | Singapore, Singapore District 5 | residential for sale | 5051 | 40 | — | — | — | 2017 | February 25, 2017 | Oct 2020 – Dec 2020 | Mar 2019 | more than 9 months early | estimated | completed |
| Alex Residences | Singapore, Singapore District 3 | residential for sale | 4291 | 40 | — | — | — | 2013 | November 2013 | Oct 2017 – Dec 2017 | Sep 2017 | dates under review | dates under review | completed |
| UIC Building | Singapore, Singapore | office | — | 23 | 30,935 m² | — | 5% (upon booking) + 15% (within 8 weeks)1 | 2013 | June 2013 | Mar 2017 | Apr 2017 | +1.0 mo (+1.0 to +1.0) | sourced | completed |
| Pollen & Bleu | Singapore, Singapore 10 | residential for sale | 1061 | 8 | 10,030 m² | — | 20/801 | 2014 | 2014 | Jan 2018 – Dec 2018 | Nov 2016 | more than 9 months early | estimated | completed |
| Auditor | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
| Coverage | active |
| Tracked since | October 11, 2026 |
| Last checked | October 12, 2026 this month |
| Profile last researched | October 12, 2026 |
| Claim |